The dodo-bird debate, empirically supported relationships and functional analytic psychotherapy.

fappapercliniciantier 3link oklink-only

Open source

Overview

AI-generated summary, not a substitute for reading the source.

This paper examines the 'dodo-bird verdict,' which suggests that diverse psychotherapies often yield similar outcomes due to common factors rather than specific techniques. The authors propose using functional analysis within Functional Analytic Psychotherapy as an idiographic alternative to empirically supported treatments for understanding therapeutic change. The resource is intended for readers interested in behavior analytic perspectives on the therapeutic relationship and outcome research.

ID
64931a5ce6d44b0f
Source org
OpenAlex
Author
Luc Vandenberghe, Ana Carolina Aquino de Sousa
Published
2005-01-01
OA status
hybrid
DOI
10.1037/h0100756
PMID
Not recorded
PMCID
Not recorded
Citations
6

Tags

Verification

Automated checks only, not clinical endorsement or advice.

Cite this entry

BibTeX

@article{allodium:64931a5ce6d44b0f,
  title = {The dodo-bird debate, empirically supported relationships and functional analytic psychotherapy.},
  author = {Luc Vandenberghe and Ana Carolina Aquino de Sousa},
  year = {2005},
  journal = {OpenAlex},
  doi = {10.1037/h0100756},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100756}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - The dodo-bird debate, empirically supported relationships and functional analytic psychotherapy.
AU  - Vandenberghe, Luc
AU  - Sousa, Ana Carolina Aquino de
PY  - 2005
PB  - OpenAlex
DO  - 10.1037/h0100756
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100756
ER  -

APA

Vandenberghe, L., & Sousa, A. C. A. D. (2005). The dodo-bird debate, empirically supported relationships and functional analytic psychotherapy.. OpenAlex. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100756

Related entries

More like this