Beyond RCTs—Better Research Designs and Methods for Psychosocial Efficacy Studies in Mental Health
Overview
This narrative review discusses alternative research methodologies for evaluating psychosocial interventions in mental health, arguing that classic randomized controlled trials often lack external validity for these treatments. It outlines various designs such as adaptive trials, single-case experimental methods, experience sampling, and hybrid effectiveness studies to better capture real-world delivery and individual preferences. The resource is intended for researchers seeking to improve the study of non-medical psychiatric interventions.
- ID
b723321384e34f40- Source org
- PubMed Central
- Author
- Tania Lecomte (Université de Montréal), Ian Raugh (McGill University), Meryl Caiada (Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Mahesh Menon (University of British Columbia)
- Published
- 2026-06-01
- OA status
- hybrid
- DOI
- 10.1177/07067437261456381
- PMID
- Not recorded
- PMCID
- Not recorded
- Citations
- 0
Tags
Verification
- identityok via crossref · score 1 · checked_at unknown
- legitimacykeep via unknown · score 0.95 · checked_at unknown
- linkok via http-check · 2026-07-21T15:52:31.592259+00:00
Cite this entry
BibTeX
@article{allodium:b723321384e34f40,
title = {Beyond RCTs—Better Research Designs and Methods for Psychosocial Efficacy Studies in Mental Health},
author = {Tania Lecomte and Ian Raugh and Meryl Caiada and Mahesh Menon},
year = {2026},
journal = {PubMed Central},
doi = {10.1177/07067437261456381},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437261456381}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Beyond RCTs—Better Research Designs and Methods for Psychosocial Efficacy Studies in Mental Health AU - Lecomte, Tania AU - Raugh, Ian AU - Caiada, Meryl AU - Menon, Mahesh PY - 2026 PB - PubMed Central DO - 10.1177/07067437261456381 UR - https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437261456381 ER -
APA
Lecomte, T., Raugh, I., Caiada, M., & Menon, M. (2026). Beyond RCTs—Better Research Designs and Methods for Psychosocial Efficacy Studies in Mental Health. PubMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437261456381
Related entries
- Effectiveness of Psychological Intervention Methods for the Management of Positive and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
- A randomised controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for psychosis: study protocol
- Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis: Randomised controlled trial
- Efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Daily Life (ACT-DL) in early psychosis: study protocol for a multi-centre randomized controlled trial
- Brief psychological interventions for schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- We need more research on inpatient group therapy: A call to action
- Enhancing Assertive Community Treatment With Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training for Schizophrenia: II. Ecological Momentary Assessment Outcomes in a Pragmatic Randomized-Controlled Trial
- The Role of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Improving Social Functioning Among Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review
- Group acceptance and commitment therapy for patients and caregivers in psychosis services: Feasibility of training and a preliminary randomized controlled evaluation
- The safety and efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy against psychotic symptomatology: a systematic review and meta-analysis