Search every field
Partial results: at least one source did not answer. Available results are shown rather than treating an upstream outage as zero matches.
Source status
- crossref
- europe-pmc
- datacite
- pubmed
- doaj
- zenodo
- hal
- arxiv
- doab
Understanding the Factors that Influence the Motivation of Disability Support Workers in Melbourne
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Made in the Image of the Creator? AI Use in Creative Work Reduces Authenticity, Love & Other Psychological Benefits
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Gamification In Education Improving Learning Outcomes And Student Motivation
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
RESEARCH COLLECTION / FLAGSHIPS 61–70 OF 90 Yin-Yang Dynamics & Five-Phase Intelligent Acupuncture at the Limit STARLI Acupuncture Trilogy | F61–F70 of 90 | Author 33 | Research Design Working Edition v1.0 This ten-volume research-design collection develops testable questions inspired by yin-yang dynamics and five-phase philosophy, spanning bounded feedback models, autonomic coupling, physiological transitions, predictive digital twins, circadian timing, multisystem networks, neuroendocrine-immune associations, explainable AI, recovery resilience and simulated multiobjective optimization. Traditional terms serve as conceptual labels, not evidence of unmeasured energies or clinical benefits. Two five-theme research units assemble ten English 777-page working editions: 300 conditional mathematical model plates, 820 chapter openings, 4,100 separately paginated investigations, 2,000 Research Gates and 330 Phoenix Answer Embryos. Designs specify measurable targets, orthogonal checks, concealed tests, rival explanations and stop decisions. These are proposed research protocols, not outcomes of clinical trials or validated therapies. Research Unit I · F61–F65 / Yin-Yang Dynamics F61 YIN-YANG DYNAMIC BALANCE AND INTELLIGENT ACUPUNCTURE CONTROL AT THE LIMIT — Models multichannel return to a prespecified physiological reference band in a hardware-in-the-loop simulator. Blinded reference reversals and intervention-order swaps challenge apparent gains against passive relaxation, PID control and linear model predictive control. No treatment decisions are made. F62 YIN-YANG INTERDEPENDENCE AND BIDIRECTIONAL AUTONOMIC REGULATION AT THE LIMIT — Tests lagged covariance between independently supported autonomic proxy channels. Masked breathing and posture swaps, pressure witnesses and matched univariate forecasts probe common-input artifacts; the model must refuse claims when sympathetic and parasympathetic effects cannot be identified separately. F63 YIN-YANG TRANSFORMATION AND HUMAN PHYSIOLOGICAL STATE TRANSITIONS AT THE LIMIT — Predeclares stress–rest–recovery state labels and scores held-out transition predictions from permitted non-invasive archives. Concealed task/rest order and frozen hidden Markov and time-only comparators test whether transitions survive label leakage and ordinary recovery trends. F64 YIN-YANG IMBALANCE CONCEPTS AND PERSONALIZED ACUPUNCTURE DIGITAL TWINS AT THE LIMIT — Asks whether blinded traditional-pattern labels add out-of-site AUC or log-likelihood beyond age, symptoms and physiology. Rater exchanges, locked pipelines and random-label controls interrogate observer leakage; retrospective twin forecasts do not authorize autonomous acupuncture. F65 YIN-YANG TEMPORAL PHILOSOPHY AND CIRCADIAN ACUPUNCTURE CONTROL AT THE LIMIT — Tests circadian-phase forecasts against matched cosinor and sleep–light history models. Blinded shifts of archived light exposure and sleep timing probe whether apparent traditional timing information persists after independent phase calibration; the work remains non-interventional. SECOND RESEARCH UNIT / FIVE-PHASE NETWORKS & SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE Research Unit II · F66–F70 / Five-Phase Models F66 FIVE-PHASE GENERATION-RESTRAINT PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN MULTISYSTEM NETWORK MODELING AT THE LIMIT — Compares a locked five-node physiological graph with sparse and autoregressive network baselines. Concealed sensor-to-phase permutations probe decorative labeling; held-out log scores and edge stability must improve before assigning predictive value to the proposed topology. F67 FIVE-PHASE PHILOSOPHY AND NEUROENDOCRINE-IMMUNE NETWORKS AT THE LIMIT — Examines delayed hormone–immune associations in permitted archived assays. Resampling frequency challenges and diurnal-adjusted regressions test whether apparent network delays are caused by circadian trends or shared sampling clocks; impossible biological lags trigger rejection. F68 FIVE-PHASE PATTERN DIFFERENTIATION AND EXPLAINABLE AI IN MEDICINE AT THE LIMIT — Tests whether blinded pattern categories add held-out discrimination and calibration beyond conventional clinical covariates. Hidden institution/annotator shifts, permuted labels and external validation confront leakage, annotation bias and unreliable diagnostic confidence; no automated diagnosis is claimed. F69 FIVE-PHASE CYCLIC PHILOSOPHY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL NETWORK RESILIENCE AT THE LIMIT — Measures normalized residual recovery after ethically bounded observations or simulated network disruptions. Concealed removal of a simulated node and passive-return or linear-dynamics controls test whether cyclical mapping adds anything beyond conventional feedback; protective thresholds remain absolute. F70 FIVE-PHASE PHILOSOPHY AND MULTIOBJECTIVE INTELLIGENT ACUPUNCTURE OPTIMIZATION AT THE LIMIT — Examines stability of a simulated Pareto front for benefit, burden and uncertainty within a hard safety set. Sealed comfort/uncertainty priority swaps expose arbitrary weight selection; the design does not perform or recommend human acupuncture interventions. Physical Scope, Falsifiability & Evidence Status The studies are restricted to consented or authorized de-identified non-invasive recordings, archived assays, synthetic data, offline analyses and simulation or hardware-in-the-loop testing. There are no delivered acupuncture treatments, clinical trials or established efficacy findings. Conventional matched-budget baselines, fixed labels, independent physical witnesses and explicit stopping criteria are required before any candidate advantage can be claimed. The stated methodological ancestry is the STARLI 90 Flagship Master v1.3, with source-supplied DOI references 10.5281/zenodo.23480803, 10.5281/zenodo.23486020 and 10.5281/zenodo.23318840. These records are research lineage, not independent validation of the proposed models. DOI metadata, formula-domain fit and scientific interpretations require separate external checking. Research Gates & Quality Assurance Boundary The supplied batch QA reports ten 777-page PDFs and no exact duplicate Gate questions or complete six-part annotations. Lexical nearest-neighbor analysis reported a maximum score of 0.8598, with 42 matches at or above 0.80 and none at or above 0.90. Automated checks do not establish independent mechanisms, empirical novelty or clinical safety; specialized review and prospective testing remain outstanding. Join the STARLI Research Community Explore more than 100 interdisciplinary research themes and follow the evolving STARLI Research Gate community: https://zenodo.org/communities/starli-research-gate/ We do not need to know which door future generations will choose to open. We only hope that when they open it, they will find a little light to guide their way. 🌈🚪✨
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Herzberg's two-factor theory on two separate scales with an example
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Data_Greater perceived choice accompanies poorer motor performance when feedback choices determine rewards
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.