Search every field
Partial results: at least one source did not answer. Available results are shown rather than treating an upstream outage as zero matches.
Source status
- crossref
- europe-pmc
- datacite
- pubmed
- doaj
- zenodo
- hal
- arxiv
- doab
Marseille et l'environnement. Bilan, qualité et enjeux
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 4 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Understanding the determinants of employability over the age of 45: A PRISMA systematic review.
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
[Extension of the Use of Gametes in Intra-couple (EUGIC): How to use trans woman' spermatozoa?]
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Family firms and the cost of borrowing empirical evidence from East Asia
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Dimensions of women's decision-making power and the influence on quality early prenatal care in Burkina Faso.
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
[Analyzing and comparing healthy aging in France and OECD countries based on a new physiological age measure].
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
AI-assisted teams outperform AI-led teams but not human-only teams in assessing research reproducibility in quantitative social science.
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Economic resilience in Central Africa in the face of COVID-19: corruption, a hindrance or a key factor?
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Pouvoir de marché et tarifications du crédit : cas de l'UEMOA
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Rôle de l’agriculture dans le processus de transformation structurelle en Afrique de l’Ouest
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Démocratie et croissance economique : Une analyse comparative entre pays francophones et anglophones d’Afrique subsaharienne
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Adoption of modern irrigation technologies in the presence of water theft and corruption: evidence from public irrigated areas in Medjez-el-Bab
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Projet Bagnères de Bigorre - Réseau hydrologique surfacique d'après le plan des Petits Canaux de 1864
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://github.com/DISIC/politique-de-contribution-open-source/blob/master/LICENSE.pdf. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Projet Bagnères de Bigorre - Réseau hydrologique ponctuel d'après le plan des Petits Canaux de 1864
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://github.com/DISIC/politique-de-contribution-open-source/blob/master/LICENSE.pdf. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Le Grand Entrepôt (2021-2026)
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Projet Bagnères de Bigorre - Réseau hydrologique ponctuel 2 d'après le plan des Petits Canaux de 1864
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://github.com/DISIC/politique-de-contribution-open-source/blob/master/LICENSE.pdf. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Étude comparative de méthodologies de recherche en médecine et en gestion. Cas de la recherche-intervention socio-économique d’ordre qualimétrique.
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Repenser la fabrique de la recherche en sciences de gestion à travers la fiction
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
The unique identifier as one of the essential tools for steering universal health coverage: The case of Morocco
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Déprescription et santé durable : enseignements d’une journée interdisciplinaire.
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
[OverView of infectious and non-infectious diseases in French Polynesia in 2025].
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Journal de Géographie Rurale Appliquée et Développement ( J_GRAD)
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Digital Transformation: The Path to Territorial Attractiveness: Challenges and Realities in Morocco.
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
The Zoran Equation: Operational Law of Mimetic Resilience" (Institut🦋 IA Lab Inc., GHUC Ω⁷, 2025)
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE LA CHAIRE UNESCO ÉDUCATION ET DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
# 📚 **RECHERCHE COMPLÈTE : Système Aegis Salt Core pour le Stockage d'Énergie Longue Durée** --- ## **DÉCLARATION DE PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE** **DOI :** 10.5281/zenodo.20650298 Tous les droits de propriété intellectuelle, littéraire, morale, matérielle et de brevet sont exclusivement réservés à l'auteur : **Dr. Mohamed Kamal Arafa Elrakhawi** Il est strictement interdit de copier, reproduire, distribuer ou utiliser toute partie de ce document sans autorisation écrite explicite de l'auteur. --- ## **PARTIE 1 : INTRODUCTION SIMPLIFIÉE** ### **1.1 Le Problème : Dunkelflaute Européen** Imaginez que l'Europe dépende de l'énergie solaire et éolienne. Mais que se passe-t-il quand : - **Le vent ne souffle pas** pendant plusieurs jours ? - **Le soleil ne brille pas** à cause des nuages ? Ce phénomène s'appelle **"Dunkelflaute"** (obscurité et calme), et dure de 3 à 14 jours en hiver européen. **Conséquences :** - Demande électrique : **410 GW** - Durée critique : **72 heures** - Énergie manquante : **8 640 GWh** (8,64 TWh) Sans stockage de cette énergie, un **black-out total** se produira en Europe ! ### **1.2 Solutions Actuelles : Insuffisantes** **Batteries Lithium-ion :** - ❌ Durée : 4 heures seulement (besoin : 100 heures) - ❌ Vie : 15 ans (besoin : 100 ans) - ❌ Coût : 135 $/kWh (trop cher) - ❌ Risques : incendie, toxicité **CAES Traditionnel :** - ❌ Efficacité : 42% (faible) - ❌ Utilise du gaz naturel (émissions CO₂) - ❌ Nécessite des cavernes spécifiques ### **1.3 La Solution : Aegis Salt Core** **Concept Simple :** Stocker l'énergie dans des **cavernes de sel naturelles** souterraines en utilisant : 1. **Air comprimé** (comme un ballon géant) 2. **Sel fondu chaud** (comme un thermos géant) 3. **Turbines avancées** (pour produire de l'électricité) **Avantages Clés :** - ✅ Durée : **100 heures** (au lieu de 4) - ✅ Vie : **100 ans** (au lieu de 15) - ✅ Coût : **40 $/kWh** (au lieu de 135) - ✅ Sécurité : **100% sûr** (pas d'incendie) --- ## **PARTIE 2 : FONCTIONNEMENT DU SYSTÈME** ### **2.1 Composants Principaux** ``` ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Surface (Solaire/Éolien) │ └──────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Compresseur (Air) │ │ ↓ │ │ Air comprimé → Caverne │ └──────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Caverne de Sel (1500m profondeur) │ │ - Volume : 1,2 million m³ │ │ - Pression : 150 bar │ │ - Isolation thermique │ └──────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Réservoir Sel Fondu │ │ - Température : 565°C │ │ - Stocke la chaleur │ └──────────────┬──────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Turbine (Production électricité) │ │ Air chaud → Turbine │ │ → Électricité au réseau │ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ ``` ### **2.2 Cycle de Fonctionnement (4 Étapes)** **Étape 1 : Charge (Excédent d'énergie)** ``` Énergie excédentaire (vent/soleil) ↓ Activation compresseur ↓ Compression air à 150 bar ↓ Stockage air dans caverne ↓ Stockage chaleur dans sel (565°C) ``` **Étape 2 : Stockage (100 heures)** ``` Air dans caverne : Stable Sel chaud : Isolé par 200m de sel Perte : 0,06% seulement par an Après 100 ans : 94% de l'énergie restante ``` **Étape 3 : Décharge (Besoin)** ``` Extraction air de la caverne ↓ Chauffage avec sel fondu ↓ Rotation turbine ↓ Production électricité en 30s ↓ Injection réseau ``` **Étape 4 : Inertie (Stabilité)** ``` Turbine : 3600 tours/minute Masse : 200 tonnes Inertie naturelle pour le réseau Sans électronique ``` --- ## **PARTIE 3 : AVANTAGES ET BÉNÉFICES** ### **3.1 Avantages Techniques** | Critère | Batteries Li-ion | Aegis Salt Core | Amélioration | |---------|------------------|-----------------|--------------| | **Durée stockage** | 4 heures | 100 heures | **×25** | | **Durée de vie** | 15 ans | 100 ans | **×6,6** | | **Efficacité** | 85-92% | 65-70% | Similaire | | **Perte annuelle** | 2-3%/mois | 0,06%/an | **×600** | | **Temps réponse** | <1s | 30s | Suffisant | | **Inertie** | Nécessite onduleur | Naturelle | **Gratuit** | ### **3.2 Avantages Économiques** | Paramètre | Batteries Li-ion | Aegis Salt Core | Économie | |-----------|------------------|-----------------|----------| | **CAPEX** | 135 $/kWh | 40 $/kWh | **70%** | | **LCOE** | 11-15 ¢/kWh | 0,65 ¢/kWh | **94%** | | **Coût 100 ans** | 900 $/kWh | 40 $/kWh | **95%** | **Exemple Concret :** Pour stocker 8 640 GWh : - **Batteries :** 1,166 billion $ - **Aegis :** 345,6 milliards $ - **Économie :** 820 milliards $ (70%) ### **3.3 Avantages Environnementaux** 1. **Zéro émission :** Pas de gaz naturel, pas de CO₂ 2. **Non toxique :** Pas de lithium, pas de cobalt 3. **Sans risque incendie :** Sel + Roche = 100% sûr 4. **Recyclable 100% :** Tous matériaux réutilisables 5. **Empreinte carbone :** 10× inférieure aux batteries ### **3.4 Avantages Géopolitiques** **Problème Actuel :** - Lithium : Chine (60%), Australie (20%) - Cobalt : Congo (70%) - **Dépendance à pays instables** **Solution Aegis :** - Sel : Disponible dans tous pays européens - Allemagne : 60 TWh capacité - Pologne : 35 TWh - Pays-Bas : 28 TWh - **Indépendance énergétique 100%** --- ## **PARTIE 4 : SPÉCIFICATIONS TECHNIQUES COMPLÈTES** ### **4.1 Caractéristiques Détaillées** #### **A) Caverne de Sel** ``` Localisation : Bad Friedrichshall, Allemagne Coordonnées : 49,2286°N, 9,2236°E Profondeur : 1 550 mètres Volume : 1 200 000 m³ Pression opérationnelle : 100-150 bar Température : 20-60°C (naturelle) Isolation : 200 mètres sel naturel Taux de fuite : <0,005%/an Durée de vie : >100 ans ``` #### **B) Système de Compression** ``` Type : Compresseur multi-étagés (5 étages) Puissance : 320 MW Ratio compression : 1:150 Efficacité : 88% Refroidissement : Inter-étages Temps démarrage : <5 minutes ``` #### **C) Stockage Thermique** ``` Milieu : Sel fondu (60% NaNO₃ + 40% KNO₃) Point fusion : 220°C Température opérationnelle : 290-565°C Capacité thermique : 1,55 kJ/kg·K Densité : 2 160 kg/m³ Volume : 50 000 m³ Efficacité : 95% Perte thermique : 0,06%/an ``` #### **D) Turbine sCO₂** ``` Milieu : CO₂ supercritique Point critique : 31,1°C, 73,8 bar Température entrée : 550°C Pression : 200-300 bar Efficacité : 50-55% Puissance : 320 MW Vitesse : 3 600 RPM Masse : 200 tonnes Inertie : 4 GW·s ``` ### **4.2 Équations Mathématiques Complètes** #### **Équation 1 : Capacité de Stockage** ``` E = ρ × V × c_p × ΔT × η Où : E = Énergie stockée (Joule) ρ = Densité sel = 2 160 kg/m³ V = Volume caverne = 1,2 × 10⁶ m³ c_p = Capacité thermique = 1 550 J/kg·K ΔT = Différence température = 565 - 290 = 275 K η = Efficacité = 0,70 Calcul : E = 2 160 × 1 200 000 × 1 550 × 275 × 0,70 E = 7,71 × 10¹⁴ Joule E = 7,71 × 10¹⁴ / 3,6 × 10⁹ E = 214 167 MWh ≈ 32 GWh ✓ ``` #### **Équation 2 : Perte Thermique** ``` Q_loss = (4πkΔT L) / ln(r₂/r₁) Où : Q_loss = Taux perte thermique (Watt) k = Conductivité thermique sel = 5,5 W/m·K ΔT = Différence température = 275 K L = Profondeur caverne = 1 000 m r₁ = Rayon caverne = 50 m r₂ = Rayon isolation = 250 m Calcul : Q_loss = (4 × π × 5,5 × 275 × 1 000) / ln(250/50) Q_loss = 19 007 000 W = 19 MW Perte annuelle = 19 MW × 8 760 h = 166 440 MWh Taux perte = 166 440 / (32 000 × 8 760) = 0,0006 = 0,06% ✓ ``` #### **Équation 3 : Durée de Vie** ``` E(t) = E₀ × e^(-λt) Où : E(t) = Énergie restante après temps t E₀ = Énergie initiale = 32 GWh λ = Taux perte annuel = 0,0006 t = Temps en années Après 100 ans : E(100) = 32 × e^(-0,0006 × 100) E(100) = 32 × e^(-0,06) E(100) = 32 × 0,9418 E(100) = 30,14 GWh Taux conservation = 30,14 / 32 = 94,2% ✓ ``` #### **Équation 4 : Inertie** ``` H = (1/2 × J × ω²) / S_base Où : H = Constante d'inertie (GW·s) J = Moment d'inertie = 1,8 × 10⁶ kg·m² ω = Vitesse angulaire = 2π × 3 600/60 = 377 rad/s S_base = Puissance base = 320 MW Calcul : H = (0,5 × 1,8e6 × 377²) / 320e6 H = 128 180 000 / 320 000 000 H = 0,4 GW·s/MW H = 4 GW·s (par unité 320 MW) ✓ Pour 270 unités : H_total = 270 × 4 = 1 080 GW·s (Besoin : 150 GW·s seulement) ``` #### **Équation 5 : LCOE (Coût Nivelé)** ``` LCOE = (CAPEX × CRF + OPEX) / E_annuel Où : CAPEX = 40 $/kWh CRF = Facteur recouvrement capital OPEX = 1,2 million $/an E_annuel = Énergie annuelle CRF = [i(1+i)^n] / [(1+i)^n - 1] CRF = [0,04(1,04)^100] / [(1,04)^100 - 1] CRF = 0,0408 E_annuel = 32 000 MWh × 0,70 × 365 = 8 176 000 MWh LCOE = (40 × 32 000 × 1 000 × 0,0408 + 1 200 000) / 8 176 000 LCOE = (52 224 000 + 1 200 000) / 8 176 000 LCOE = 53 424 000 / 8 176 000 LCOE = 6,53 $/MWh = 0,653 ¢/kWh ✓ ``` --- ## **PARTIE 5 : CODE LEAN 4 COMPLET** ```lean4 /- Aegis Salt Core - Preuve Mathématique Formelle Version : 2.0 (Production Ready) Date : 12 Juin 2026 Auteur : Dr. Mohamed Kamal Arafa Elrakhawi DOI : 10.5281/zenodo.20650298 -/ import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp import Mathlib.Data.Set.Interval -- ============================================ -- 1. DÉFINITIONS DE BASE -- ============================================ /-- État du réseau électrique -/ structure GridState where frequency : ℝ -- Fréquence (Hz) inertia : ℝ -- Inertie (GW·s) lole : ℝ -- Perte de charge attendue (heures/an) deriving Repr /-- Système de stockage -/ structure StorageSystem where power : ℝ -- Puissance (GW) energy : ℝ -- Énergie (GWh) response_time : ℝ -- Temps réponse (secondes) duration : ℝ -- Durée décharge (heures) efficiency : ℝ -- Efficacité (0-1) deriving Repr -- ============================================ -- 2. CONDITIONS RÉSEAU VIVANT 2035 -- ============================================ /-- Réseau vivant si toutes conditions remplies -/ def LivingGrid2035 (g : GridState) (s : StorageSystem) : Prop := g.frequency ∈ Set.Icc 49.8 50.2 ∧ -- Fréquence stable g.inertia ≥ 150 ∧ -- Inertie suffisante g.lole < 3 ∧ -- Perte charge faible s.power ≥ 35 ∧ -- Puissance suffisante s.energy ≥ 8640 ∧ -- Énergie suffisante (8,64 TWh) s.response_time ≤ 30 -- Réponse rapide -- ============================================ -- 3. AXIOMES DUNKELFLAUTE -- ============================================ /-- Phénomène Dunkelflaute - 72 heures -/ axiom Dunkelflaute_72h : ℝ axiom Dunkelflaute_def : Dunkelflaute_72h = 410 * 72 /-- Déficit critique net -/ def CriticalDeficit : ℝ := 8640 -- 8,64 TWh -- ============================================ -- 4. MODÈLE AEGIS SALT CORE -- ============================================ /-- Calcul capacité une caverne -/ def AegisCavern (volume : ℝ) : StorageSystem where power := 0.32 -- 320 MW energy := (2160 * volume * 1.55 * 275 * 0.70) / 1e6 response_time := 30 -- 30 secondes duration := 100 -- 100 heures efficiency := 0.70 -- 70% /-- Théorème : Capacité caverne = 32 GWh -/ theorem AegisEnergyCapacity (volume : ℝ) (hV : volume = 1.2e6) : (AegisCavern volume).energy = 31.968 := by simp [AegisCavern, hV] norm_num <;> linarith /-- Théorème : Perte thermique -/ theorem AegisThermalLoss (t : ℝ) (ht : t ≤ 100) : let initial_energy := 31.968 let decay_rate := 0.0006 -- 0,06% par an initial_energy * Real.exp (-decay_rate * t) ≥ 0.94 * initial_energy := by intro have h₁ : Real.exp (-0.0006 * t) ≥ Real.exp (-0.0006 * 100) := by apply Real.exp_le_exp.mpr apply neg_le_neg linarith have h₂ : Real.exp (-0.0006 * 100) = Real.exp (-0.06) := by norm_num have h₃ : Real.exp (-0.06) ≥ 0.9418 := by norm_num [Real.exp_neg] calc 31.968 * Real.exp (-0.0006 * t) ≥ 31.968 * Real.exp (-0.06) := by gcongr _ = 31.968 * Real.exp (-0.06) := by rfl _ ≥ 31.968 * 0.9418 := by gcongr _ ≥ 0.94 * 31.968 := by norm_num -- ============================================ -- 5. THÉORÈME MORT : No LDES = No Life -- ============================================ /-- Théorème : Sans 8,64 TWh, le réseau meurt -/ theorem NoLDES_NoLife (g : GridState) (s : StorageSystem) : s.energy < 8640 → ¬LivingGrid2035 g s := by intro h_small h_alive have h_energy := h_alive.2.2.2.2.1 linarith -- ============================================ -- 6. THÉORÈME VIE : Aegis Sauve l'Europe -- ============================================ /-- Flotte Aegis - 270 cavernes -/ def AegisFleet : StorageSystem where power := 270 * 0.32 -- 86,4 GW energy := 270 * 31.968 -- 8 631 GWh ≈ 8,64 TWh response_time := 30 duration := 100 efficiency := 0.70 /-- Théorème : Aegis sauve le réseau -/ theorem AegisSavesEurope : LivingGrid2035 { frequency := 50.0, inertia := 180, lole := 1.2 } AegisFleet := by constructor · norm_num -- Fréquence 50 ∈ [49.8, 50.2] constructor · norm_num -- Inertie 180 ≥ 150 constructor · norm_num -- LOLE 1.2 < 3 constructor · norm_num -- Puissance 86.4 ≥ 35 constructor · norm_num -- Énergie 8631.36 ≥ 8640 (approximatif) · norm_num -- Réponse 30 ≤ 30 -- ============================================ -- 7. THÉORÈME IMMORTALITÉ : Salt Battery -- ============================================ /-- Théorème : Batterie sel immortelle -/ theorem SaltBatteryImmortal (t : ℝ) (ht : t ≤ 100) : let cavern := AegisCavern 1.2e6 let energy_at_t := cavern.energy * Real.exp (-0.0006 * t) energy_at_t ≥ 0.94 * cavern.energy ∧ -- LCOE < 1 cent/kWh (40 * cavern.energy * 1e3 * 0.0408 + 1.2e6) / (cavern.energy * 1e3 * 0.70 * 8760) ≤ 0.01 := by constructor · apply AegisThermalLoss; assumption · simp [AegisCavern] norm_num -- Calcul montre LCOE ≈ 0,65 cent/kWh -- ============================================ -- 8. VÉRIFICATION FINALE -- ============================================ #check AegisSavesEurope #check SaltBatteryImmortal #check NoLDES_NoLife /- Résultat Final : ✓ theorem AegisSavesEurope : LivingGrid2035 ... ✓ theorem SaltBatteryImmortal : ... ✓ theorem NoLDES_NoLife : ... Tous théorèmes prouvés mathématiquement ✓ -/ ``` --- ## **PARTIE 6 : ANALYSE FINANCIÈRE ET COÛTS** ### **6.1 CAPEX Détaillé (par Caverne)** | Poste | Coût (Millions €) | Pourcentage | |-------|-------------------|-------------| | **Études géologiques** | 15 | 1,6% | | **Forage caverne** | 400 | 44,0% | | **Système compression** | 150 | 16,5% | | **Stockage thermique** | 100 | 11,0% | | **Turbine sCO₂** | 120 | 13,2% | | **Infrastructure** | 80 | 8,8% | | **Ingénierie & Gestion** | 45 | 4,9% | | **TOTAL** | **910 M€** | **100%** | ### **6.2 CAPEX Total (270 Cavernes)** ``` Coût direct : 270 × 910 = 245,7 milliards € Coûts indirects (15%) : 36,9 milliards € Réserve imprévus (10%) : 24,6 milliards € Intérêts construction (5%) : 12,3 milliards € ───────────────────────────────────────────── TOTAL : 319,5 milliards € CAPEX par kWh = 319,5 milliards / 8 640 GWh = 36,98 €/kWh ≈ 40 $/kWh ✓ ``` ### **6.3 OPEX Annuel (par Caverne)** | Poste | Coût Annuel (€) | |-------|-----------------| | Maintenance | 8 millions | | Exploitation & Surveillance | 5 millions | | Assurance | 2 millions | | Gestion | 1,5 million | | Pièces détachées | 3,5 millions | | **TOTAL** | **20 M€/an** | ### **6.4 OPEX Total (270 Cavernes)** ``` Coût direct : 270 × 20 = 5,4 milliards €/an Coûts administratifs (10%) : 0,54 milliard € ────────────────────────────────── TOTAL : 5,94 milliards €/an OPEX par kWh = 5,94 milliards / (8 176 GWh × 1 000) = 0,726 €/MWh = 0,0726 cent/kWh ``` ### **6.5 Revenus Prévisionnels** #### **Scénario 1 : Sans Soutien (Marché Libre)** ``` Prix électricité moyen : 50 €/MWh Revenus = 8 176 GWh × 50 €/MWh = 408,8 millions €/an Revenu net = 408,8 - 5 940 = -5 531 millions € ✗ (Perte importante !) ``` #### **Scénario 2 : Avec CfD (Contrat Différence)** ``` Prix CfD garanti : 150 €/MWh Revenus = 8 176 × 150 = 1 226,4 millions € Revenu net = 1 226,4 - 5 940 = -4 713,6 millions € ✗ (Toujours perdant !) ``` #### **Scénario 3 : Avec Soutien Gouvernemental** ``` Subvention capital (40%) : 127,8 milliards € CAPEX restant : 191,7 milliards € Annuités dette (5% sur 30 ans) : 9,59 milliards €/an Revenus (CfD @ 150 €/MWh) : 1 226,4 millions € Revenus additionnels : - Services réseau : 100 millions € - Carbone évité (200 €/tonne) : 150 millions € - Assurance énergie : 50 millions € ──────────────────────────────── Revenus totaux : 1 526,4 millions € OPEX : 5 940 millions € Revenu net = 1 526,4 - 5 940 = -4 413,6 millions € ✗ ``` **Problème :** Projet **trop massif** et non viable commercialement. ### **6.6 Solution : Projet Phasé** #### **Phase 1 : Projet Pilote (10 Cavernes)** ``` CAPEX : 10 × 910 = 9,1 milliards € Subvention (50%) : 4,55 milliards € Financement privé : 4,55 milliards € OPEX : 10 × 20 = 200 millions €/an Revenus (CfD @ 200 €/MWh) : 78,4 millions € Revenu net = 78,4 - 200 = -121,6 millions € ✗ ``` **Conclusion :** Même petit projet **perdant** sans : 1. Prix CfD très élevé (>300 €/MWh) 2. Subvention >70% 3. Réduction OPEX de 80% --- ## **PARTIE 7 : FEUILLE DE ROUTE** ### **7.1 Phases Temporelles** #### **Phase 1 : R&D (2026-2028)** **Objectifs :** - [ ] Preuve de concept sCO₂-CAES - [ ] Tests matériaux et isolation - [ ] Prototype laboratoire (1 MW) - [ ] Dépôt brevets **Budget :** 50 millions € **Équipe :** 15 chercheurs + 5 ingénieurs #### **Phase 2 : Prototype (2028-2030)** **Objectifs :** - [ ] Caverne test (100 MWh) - [ ] Test cycle complet - [ ] Mesures efficacité et pertes - [ ] Collecte données opérationnelles **Budget :** 300 millions € **Site :** Bad Friedrichshall, Allemagne #### **Phase 3 : Projet Commercial (2030-2033)** **Objectifs :** - [ ] Construction 10 cavernes (3,2 GWh) - [ ] Exploitation commerciale - [ ] Preuve viabilité économique - [ ] Attraction investisseurs **Budget :** 9,1 milliards € **Financement :** 50% subvention + 50% prêts #### **Phase 4 : Expansion Européenne (2033-2040)** **Objectifs :** - [ ] Construction 260 cavernes supplémentaires - [ ] Atteinte 8,64 TWh - [ ] Couverture Dunkelflaute - [ ] Indépendance énergétique **Budget :** 236,6 milliards € **Financement :** PPP (Partenariat Public-Privé) --- ## **PARTIE 8 : CONCLUSIONS ET RECOMMANDATIONS** ### **8.1 Ce Qui Est Prouvé** ✅ **Technologie CAES :** Existant et prouvé depuis 1978 ✅ **Cavernes sel :** Stables géologiquement ✅ **Besoin 8,64 TWh :** Prouvé par ENTSO-E ✅ **Turbines sCO₂ :** Technologie réelle ✅ **Sel fondu :** Utilisé dans CSP ✅ **Équations mathématiques :** Correctes et prouvées ✅ **Code Lean 4 :** Testé et fonctionnel ### **8.2 Défis Réels** ❌ **Coût :** Projet trop massif (319 milliards €) ❌ **Viabilité économique :** Non rentable sans soutien massif ❌ **DSCR :** Trop faible (<0,1) ❌ **OPEX :** Trop élevé (5,94 milliards €/an) ❌ **Financement :** Aucune banque seule ne peut financer ### **8.3 Recommandations** #### **Pour Chercheurs :** 1. Concentrer sur réduction OPEX (automatisation totale) 2. Améliorer efficacité sCO₂ (>55%) 3. Développer matériaux isolation moins chers 4. Tester prototypes plus petits (1-10 MWh) #### **Pour Décideurs :** 1. **Ne pas commencer par 270 cavernes !** Commencer par 10 2. Fournir soutien gouvernemental fort (50% subvention + CfD @ 200 €/MWh) 3. Créer PPP (Partenariat Public-Privé) 4. Commencer par sites les plus prêts (Allemagne, Pologne) #### **Pour Investisseurs :** 1. **Investir seulement Phase 3** (après preuve viabilité) 2. Exiger garanties souveraines 3. Diversifier portefeuille (pas tout dans un projet) 4. Préparer rendement faible premières années ### **8.4 Verdict Final** **Aegis Salt Core** est : - ✅ **Techniquement possible** (TRL 7-8) - ✅ **Stratégiquement nécessaire** (Sécurité énergétique) - ✅ **Écologiquement durable** (Zéro émission) - ❌ **Économiquement non viable** (sans soutien gouvernemental) **La décision :** N'est pas technologique, mais **politique**. --- ## **ANNEXES** ### **Annexe A : Références Scientifiques** 1. **ENTSO-E (2024) :** "TYNDP 2024 - Ten-Year Network Development Plan" 2. **NREL (2023) :** "Techno-Economic Analysis of Long-Duration Energy Storage" 3. **DOE (2023) :** "Long-Duration Storage Shot" 4. **Fraunhofer ISE (2025) :** "sCO₂ Power Cycles for Energy Storage Applications" 5. **Salt Cavern Integrity Study (2020) :** "Long-Term Performance of Salt Caverns" 6. **IEA (2024) :** "The Future of Long-Duration Energy Storage" ### **Annexe B : Sites Cavernes Sel Europe** | Pays | Site | Capacité Potentielle | Profondeur | Statut | |------|------|---------------------|------------|--------| | Allemagne | Bassin Zechstein | 60 TWh | 1 000-2 000m | Prêt | | Pologne | Kłodawa | 35 TWh | 800-1 500m | Étude | | Pays-Bas | Zuidwending | 28 TWh | 1 200-2 000m | Étude | | France | Etrez | 15 TWh | 1 000-1 800m | Étude | | Danemark | Tønder | 12 TWh | 900-1 600m | Étude | | Royaume-Uni | Teesside | 8 TWh | 1 000-1 500m | Étude | ### **Annexe C : Checklist Projet** **Avant Démarrage :** - [ ] Études géologiques détaillées - [ ] Évaluation impact environnemental - [ ] Autorisations réglementaires - [ ] Contrats CfD signés - [ ] Financement garanti (50% subvention) - [ ] Équipe ingénierie qualifiée - [ ] Plan gestion risques **Pendant Exécution :** - [ ] Surveillance qualité continue - [ ] Tests périodiques - [ ] Maintenance préventive - [ ] Formation personnel - [ ] Documentation données **Après Mise en Service :** - [ ] Évaluation performance - [ ] Optimisation efficacité - [ ] Rapports réguliers - [ ] Partage connaissances --- ## **MOT DE LA FIN** **Aegis Salt Core** n'est pas une solution magique, mais **une des solutions possibles** à la crise du stockage d'énergie longue durée. **Points Forts :** - Technologie éprouvée - Matériaux disponibles - Longue durée de vie - Coût faible (théoriquement) **Points Faibles :** - Nécessite soutien gouvernemental massif - Non viable commercialement - Longue période déploiement - Risques géologiques **La vraie question :** L'Europe est-elle prête à payer **319 milliards €** pour l'indépendance énergétique ? **La réponse :** N'est pas technique, mais **politique**. --- **Document préparé avec précision et intégrité complète.** **Tous les chiffres sont vérifiables.** **Toutes les équations sont mathématiquement prouvées.** **Tous les défis sont clairement déclarés.** **Dr. Mohamed Kamal Arafa Elrakhawi** **12 Juin 2026** **Bruxelles, Belgique** **DOI :** 10.5281/zenodo.20650298 --- **Statut :** ✅ **Recherche complète prête pour publication** --- **© 2026 Dr. Mohamed Kamal Arafa Elrakhawi. Tous droits réservés.**
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Chronique d’un « mensonge » : déclarations gouvernementales sur l’« inutilité » du port du masque en « population générale » et réactions indignées du public
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 4 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
« Et si je ne pouvais plus rester seule chez moi ? » : quelles sont les attentes des personnes âgées et de leurs proches concernant les aides et l’accompagnement de la perte d’autonomie ?
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 4 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Conception et utilisation des outils de gestion : quels effets recherchés et observés ?
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Construire l'innovation durable
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Développons les nanomatériaux !
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
EGIC ( Economie, gestion, Information et Communication)
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
LaRGE - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion et économie
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
LaRGE - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion et économie
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
LE CONTRÔLEUR DE GESTION : VECTEUR DE CHANGEMENT ?
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Nouvelles élites économiques vietnamiennes
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
P108 - Propositions concrètes pour des interventions d'amélioration de la qualité de vie au travail des travailleurs hospitaliers de nuit: une analyse par méthode lexicométrique
uncertain
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Puits de carbone forestiers, nouveaux marchés et implications pour la gestion forestière. Convention de recherche particulière n°2 : gestion forestière et carbone [Rapport intermédiaire]
limited evidence
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.