Search every field

65 merged results for "Software Reliability Modeling"

Partial results: at least one source did not answer. Available results are shown rather than treating an upstream outage as zero matches.

Source status

crossreftimed out after 2500 ms
europe-pmcanswered in 358 ms
dataciteanswered in 297 ms
pubmedanswered in 685 ms
doajanswered in 159 ms
zenodoanswered in 1588 ms
halanswered in 303 ms
arxivanswered in 517 ms
doabreturned HTTP 403

A Three-Dimensional Volumetric Classification of Mandibular Hypoplasia in Hemifacial Microsomia.
Akiyama Y, Niimi T, Akiyama Y, Kitagawa K · 2026 · Congenital anomalies
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1002/cga.70090
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A Software Reliability Model Based on a Geometric Sequence of Failure Rates
Stefan Wagner, Helmut Fischer · 2016 · Proceedings of International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies - Ada-Europe 2006. Volume 4006 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS). pp 143-154. Springer, 2006
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · DOI 10.1007/11767077_12
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Current Trends and Future Challenges in the RNA-RNA Interaction Prediction Tools and Methods.
Kanchanapalli L, Senthilkumar H, Varadarajan S. · 2027 · Methods Mol Biol
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-5567-2_16
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Predicting RNA and Protein:RNA Complexes with AlphaFold: Possibilities, Limitations, and Practical Guidelines.
Suskiewicz MJ. · 2027 · Methods Mol Biol
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-5571-9_2
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A Fully Automated Segment-Specific CCTA Plaque Quantification Workflow using Deep Learning.
Wang H, Hou X, Liu Z, Yang J · 2026 · Journal of imaging informatics in medicine
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1007/s10278-026-02478-x
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
The ethical PROMISE NFR dataset: data for ethical concern classification in software requirements.
Bittal V, Sweta S · 2026 · Data in brief
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2026.113366
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Analysis of incorporating modified Weibull model fault detection rate function into software reliability modeling.
Sindhu TN, Shafiq A, Hammouch Z, Hassan MKH · 2024 · Heliyon
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33874
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Standardising ocular surface photography for artificial intelligence: current limitations and a proposed roadmap.
Romano V, Steger B, Airaldi M, Giuliano F · 2026 · Progress in retinal and eye research
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2026.101539
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Demineralization of brackish surface water using reverse osmosis: A case study of Zagora in the Draa-Tafilalet region, Morocco
Elyaakouby Yassine, Tilioua Amine · 2025 · E3S Web of Conferences
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202567501013
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 4 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Capturing Heterogeneous Patient Needs in Hospitals: A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Staffing Needs.
Hutfluss R, Schiller E, Ebertsch K, Brandes T · 2026 · Medical care
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1097/mlr.0000000000002393
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A generalized geometric de-eutrophication software reliability model
Olivier Gaudoin, Christian Lavergne, Jean-Louis Soler · 1994 · IEEE Transactions on Reliability
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · DOI 10.1109/24.370229
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Reliability modeling for safety-critical software
Schneidewind, Norman F. · 1997
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.1109/24.589933
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Validation of an Emotion Recognition System for People With Down Syndrome
Nancy Ivett Paredes Teran, Gonzalo Fernando Olmedo Cifuentes, Bacca Bladimir, Caicedo Eduardo · 2025 · IEEE Access
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.1109/access.2025.3610846
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 4 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
The discrete time hyperexponential model for software reliability growth evaluation
Mohamed Kaâniche, Karama Kanoun · 1992
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · DOI 10.1109/issre.1992.285857
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Cross-layer system reliability assessment framework for hardware faults
Alessandro Vallero, Alessandro Savino, Gianfranco Michele Maria Politano, Stefano Di Carlo · 2016
uncertain Transparent signal score 51/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · DOI 10.1109/test.2016.7805863
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Maximum Entropy Discrimination Poisson Regression for Software Reliability Modeling.
Chatzis SP, Andreou AS. · 2015 · IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.1109/tnnls.2015.2391171
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
An interpretable machine learning model integrating 54 test indicators and age: a single-center study on precise discrimination between serous ovarian cancer and ovarian cysts.
Liu C, Wei Z, Qiu Y, Ju Y · 2026 · BMC medical informatics and decision making
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1186/s12911-026-03727-3
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Analyzing healthcare professionals' perceptions of mHealth application adoption: task-technology fit model approach.
Hamadi A, Datoussaid A, Ferdj Y, Ezzine A · 2026 · BMC health services research
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1186/s12913-026-15151-4
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Trigonometric function transformation and its application in software reliability modeling.
Vy DN, Nguyen VT, Huynh QT, Phung TN · 2025 · PLoS One
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc, doaj · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0339286
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Assessment of algorithmic performance in PET-CT segmentation of solitary lung tumors.
Le DT, Szabó D, Aranyi S, Mikó M · 2026 · PloS one
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0360849
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Industrial-Scale Mathematical Modeling and Real-Time Predictive Software for Biogas Yield Optimization Using Regression Analysis and Big Data
Abduvalova A, Yerlanova G, Kazbekova G, Ryszhanova A · 2026
limited evidence Transparent signal score 39/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.20944/preprints202609.2055.v1
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Validation of fully automated myocardial T1 and synthetic hematocrit-based extracellular volume quantification on 3T cardiac MRI: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Kositanurit W, Theerasuwipakorn N, Suksiriworaboot T, Thammongkolchai S · 2026 · Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.21037/qims-2026-0883
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Increasing the energy efficiency of auxiliary machines of AC electric locomotive
Yu. M. Kulinich, S. A. Shukharev, A. V. Gulyaev · 2021 · Вестник Научно-исследовательского института железнодорожного транспорта
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.21780/2223-9731-2021-80-5-276-284
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
The Mediating Role of Career Motivation in the Relationship between Stress Coping Strategies and Social-Emotional Competence in Primary Teachers
Pantea Birang Khojastehpour, Fariborz Dortaj, Fatemeh Ghaemi · 2022 · پژوهش در نظام‌های آموزشی
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.22034/jiera.2022.170469
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Optimization of Integrated Decisions in Supply, Production, and Distribution in the Broiler Chicken Supply Chain Considering Different Breeds of Chickens and their Casualty
Zahrasadat Tabatabaei, Mohammad Taghi Rezvan, Saeed Dehnavi · 2025 · Muṭāli̒āt-i Mudīriyyat-i Ṣan̒atī
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.22054/jims.2026.90597.3009
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Entrepreneurial Marketing in Hospitality in the Islamic Republic of Iran - A Practical Model
Morteza Khazaei Pool, Abolfazl Tajzadehnamin, Hamid Zargham Boroujeni, Mehdi Karoubi · 2019 · Muṭāli̒āt-i Mudīriyyat-i Gardishgarī
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.22054/tms.2019.10424
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Analyzing the Influence of Place Attachment on Citizens' Environmental Protection Behaviors: A Case Study of Rasht City
Aliakbar Salaripour, Arman Hamidi, Alieh Faridi Foshtomi,, Amir Hosein Nourbakhsh · 2024 · برنامه‌ریزی توسعه شهری و منطقه‌ای
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.22054/urdp.2024.76342.1597
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A Software Reliability Growth Modeling Framework with Complexity of Path Searching
Inoue, Shinji, Yamada, Shigeru · 2018 · JUCS - Journal of Universal Computer Science
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.3217/jucs-024-12-1680
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
ВПЛИВ ТЕХНІЧНОГО СТАНУ ЕЛЕМЕНТІВ МАСЛЯНОЇ СИСТЕМИ ВИСОКООБЕРТОВОГО ДИЗЕЛЯ Д 246.4 НА ПАРАМЕТРИ ПУЛЬСАЦІЙ ТИСКУ МОТОРНОГО МАСЛА
Савчук, Володдимир Петрович, Білоусов, Євген Вікторович, Курносенко, Дар'я Вікторівна, Тулученко, Галина Яківна · 2022 · Водний транспорт
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.33298/2226-8553.2022.2.36.07
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Default Detection Rate-Dependent Software Reliability Model with Imperfect Debugging
Ce Zhang, Wei-Gong Lv, Sheng Sheng, Jin-Yong Wang · 2022 · Applied Sciences
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · DOI 10.3390/app122110736
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Secure UPnP Resource Discovery Using a PUF-Assisted Hardware Accelerator for IoT.
Khalil K. · 2026 · Sensors (Basel)
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.3390/s26175410
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A Consistency-Aware Multimodal Sensing Framework for Short-Term Cross-Border Prediction Under Dynamic Trade.
Wan Y, Wang X, Zeng X, Chen S · 2026 · Sensors (Basel)
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · DOI 10.3390/s26185806
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Function Based Nonlinear Least Squares and Application to Jelinski--Moranda Software Reliability Model
Jingwei Liu, Meizhi Xu · 2011
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Monitoring Software Reliability using Statistical Process control: An MMLE approach
R. Satya Prasad, Bandla Sreenivasa Rao, R. R. L. Kantam · 2011
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A Survey of Software Reliability Models
Ganesh J. Pai · 2013
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
The First 50 Years of Software Reliability Engineering: A History of SRE with First Person Accounts
James J. Cusick · 2019
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1902.06140
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
New Failure Rate Model for Iterative Software Development Life Cycle Process
Sangeeta, Kapil Sharma, Manju Bala · 2019
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Can we rely on smartphone applications?
Sonia Meskini, Ali Bou Nassif, Luiz Fernando Capretz · 2019
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
A Comparative Study on Parameter Estimation in Software Reliability Modeling using Swarm Intelligence
Najla Akram AL-Saati, Marrwa Abd-AlKareem Alabajee · 2020 · International Journal of Recent Research and Review, Vol. IX, Issue 4, December 2016
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
HELIOS: A surface integral equation software for light scattering in homogeneous, periodic, and stratified environments
Mavrikakis, Parmenion S., Martin, Olivier J. F. · 2026
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in datacite · DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2602.23097
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Point Processes in Large Populations
Sami Umut Can, Estate V. Khmaladze, Roger J. A. Laeven · 2026
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Modal Analysis Applied to the Stability Study of Hydroelectric Systems with Modular Structures
Silva, Pedro Camilo Oliveira · 2015
limited evidence Transparent signal score 47/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in datacite · DOI 10.5075/epfl-thesis-6780
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: N/A. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Modelling Open-Source Software Reliability Incorporating Swarm Intelligence-Based Techniques
Omar Shatnawi · 2024 · International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 15, No 6, December 2023
uncertain Transparent signal score 53/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in arxiv · DOI 10.5121/ijcsit.2023.15602
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://info.arxiv.org/help/license/index.html. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
DICaugment: A Python Package for 3D Medical Imaging Augmentation
McIntosh, J., Cao, Qian, Sahiner, Berkman, Petrick, Nicholas · 2024
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.10738855
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Effect of Insurance Agents' Entrepreneurial Characteristics on Development of Life Insurances: Case Study of Iran Insurance Company Agents in Khorasan Razavi
Navidbakhsh, Mahsa, Nategh Golestan, Ahmad · 2025 · International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17276464
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
The S.A Circuit — The Unified Law Of Compassion And Integrative Science: A Self-Stabilizing Equation Linking Empathy, Consciousness, And The Restorative Order Of The Universe
Yoo, Harry · 2025
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in datacite, datacite · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17710673
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionPublication version: Identified as a preprint; peer review and later versions may change the record. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Quality Forecasting and Reliability Modeling in Expansive .NET Application Landscapes
Hema Latha Boddupally · 2021 · European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18083733
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Reliability and Safety Assessment of Automotive Power Electronics
Hassanen, Ahmed, Faisal, Noor · 2023
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18421586
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
ML-ER-OPE: JOINT PREDICTION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT EFFORT AND RELIABILITY VIA OPERATIONAL PROFILE–DRIVEN MULTI-TASK LEARNING
SUDHAKAR KAMBHAMPATI, Dr. G VAMSI KRISHNA · 2026 · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19594101
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Flagship 57/90 Independently cross-checked potential map and cellular function is the preregistered question, not a demonstrated effect. HUMAN BIOELECTRICITY AND REGENERATIVE MICROENVIRONMENT REGULATION AT THE LIMIT This 777-page Research Design Working Edition in the STARLI Acupuncture Trilogy, Family II, develops the research question of electrical field gradients and separately observed cell-state function in a closed chip. Its core three-coupling is Bioelectric fields x cellular microenvironment x regenerative engineering. The scope is in-vitro chips and authorized ex-vivo material only; no claim of human regeneration. Ancient and contemporary philosophical terms are treated as research motivation and operational labels, not independent proof of physical forces or of treatment benefit. The candidate proposal asks whether independently cross-checked potential map and cellular function can be measured with transparent source identities and enough precision to distinguish the proposed account from culture-medium changes and cell proliferation rather than electric field organization. A prospectively frozen evaluation would test hidden electrode geometry and culture medium conductivity shifts; stronger conventional comparisons include passive chip, conductivity-matched sham field and static conditioned medium. Stop when cell injury or delayed functional decline after controlled exposure, when calibration fails, or when a study lacks appropriate permission. Aborted and negative outcomes remain part of the full eligibility denominator. Thirty conditional mathematical research plates examine distinct modeling and verification roles with explicit units, assumptions and blind counterexamples. Eighty-two chapters contain 410 separately paginated investigations. Two hundred Research Gates frame distinct pairings of a target readout, orthogonal check, concealed challenge, rival account and refusal decision. Thirty-three Phoenix Answer Embryos propose future instruments, evidence contracts and cross-laboratory research tools. This content is prospective research design and contains no completed experimental outcomes. The source study contract is the STARLI 90 Flagship Master v1.3. Methodological ancestry supplied in that document includes DOIs 10.5281/zenodo.23480803, 10.5281/zenodo.23486020 and 10.5281/zenodo.23318840. These methods do not validate the new candidate; bibliography and individual formula suitability still require independent external checking. Full English PDF. Automated structure and lexical difference checks cannot establish scientific originality, causal validity or clinical efficacy. Author: Feng Cheng-en (33) x STARLI / Xingli Series: STARLI Acupuncture Trilogy / Flagship 57 of 90 Edition: Research Design Working Edition v1.0 / 2 November 2026 Join the STARLI Research Community Explore more than 100 interdisciplinary research themes and follow the evolving STARLI Research Gate community: https://zenodo.org/communities/starli-research-gate/
33 · 2026
limited evidence Transparent signal score 47/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in datacite, datacite · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23884170
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
STARLI / YULI — F145/200 — Family 15: Regenerative BCI Co-Design 再生腦機介面微環境調控極限 Microenvironment Control In Regenerative BCI At The Limit Research position. This prospective, nonclinical Research Working Edition investigates Microenvironment oxygen concentration deviation [mg/L] in a hydrogel-electrode coculture testbed with a calibrated, independently acquired measurement reference. It proposes a scaffold–electrode–tissue causal model; it does not report completed experiments, animal studies, clinical efficacy, or validated regeneration. Testable claim. With acquisition time, authorized specimens, electrode exposure and reference assays matched, a preregistered joint-interface candidate is compared against an independently tuned conventional scaffold with a separate nonregenerative electrode. The masked challenge is concealed restriction of microfluidic flow; the chief rival is oxygen probe positioning causes apparent gradients. The primary candidate relation is Delta_C_O2 = C_target - C_measured. Interpretation requires Target and measured concentrations must share sampling time, spatial point, temperature and dissolved-oxygen calibration. Research architecture. The volume contains 30 mathematical and engineering diagnostic plates, 82 chapters with 410 one-page investigations, 200 Research Gates with three scientific letters per gate, and 33 Phoenix Answer Embryos. Methods include impedance and material-interface metrology, orthogonal biological witnesses, preregistered blinded tests, uncertainty propagation, negative-result retention, and independent reconstruction. Limitations and evidence. Escalating inflammation, premature material disintegration, loss of independent electrical reference, or revoked sample authorization are hard stops. Candidate mechanisms and formulas are not new confirmed physical laws. Foundational source identity was checked for Yuk, H., Wu, J., Zhao, X. (Nature Reviews Materials 7, 935-952 (2022)), DOI 10.1038/s41578-022-00483-4; Bierman-Duquette, R. D. et al. (Advanced Healthcare Materials 11(7), e2101577 (2022)), DOI 10.1002/adhm.202101577; these publications do not validate the new integrated hypothesis. Deep semantic distinctness across chapters and Gates requires specialist review. Author: 33 / STARLI–YULI Research Institute 36. Version v1.0; 2026-11-06. Join the STARLI Research Community Explore more than 100 interdisciplinary research themes and follow the evolving STARLI Research Gate community: https://zenodo.org/communities/starli-research-gate/
33 · 2026
limited evidence Transparent signal score 47/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in datacite, datacite · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24017718
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
When the Best Uplift Model Is Uncertain: Learner-Selection Credibility and Policy-Value Robustness.
Elmansy, Dalia · 2026
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in datacite, datacite · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24051759
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingPublication license: A publication license was supplied: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT. Presence improves reuse transparency, not research validity. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
APPLICATION OF MODERN SOFTWARE COMPLEXES FOR MODELING OF THE WORK OF DAMAGED STONE STRUCTURES
Klymenko, I., Grynyova, I., Rusu, I. · 2018 · Journal of Engineering Science
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.2576742
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Sciris: Simplifying scientific software in Python
Kerr, Cliff, Sanz-Leon, Paula, Abeysuriya, Romesh, Chadderdon, George · 2023
limited evidence Transparent signal score 43/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in zenodo · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.8245253
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Scalable hardware and software for high-density, multi-regional electrophysiology in non-human primates.
Dubey A, Xu Q, Khazali M, Choi J · 2026 · bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in pubmed · DOI 10.64898/2026.10.22.761135
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Optimisation fiabiliste en mécatronique, application à des transistors de puissance
Abdelhamid Amar · 2022
limited evidence Transparent signal score 45/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · DOI 10.70675/fefd103czfbaaz4dafzbf4bz572ce9c7795a
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Cloud–Edge Collaborative Hardware Sensing with Dynamic Reliability Estimation and Evidence-Constrained Large Language Model Reasoning
Liu L, Ren Z, Chen R, Li Y · 2026 · Sensors (Basel)
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Designing a Model for Improving Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)
Taghi Rezaei, safiyeh mehri nejad · 2026 · مدیریت بهره وری
uncertain Transparent signal score 58/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in doaj · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
EM-algorithm in software reliability modeling
James Ledoux · 2006
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Extreme-Climate-Driven Agricultural Trade Risk Sensing with Multimodal Consistency Learning and Edge Intelligence
Zhou Z, Liu R, Long X, Hu Y · 2026 · Sensors (Basel)
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in europe-pmc · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Interoperability between a dynamic reliability modeling and a Systems Engineering process: Principles and Case Study
Gilles Deleuze, Aurélie Léger, Pierre-Yves Piriou, Sylvain Chabroux · 2013
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Interoperability between a dynamic reliability modeling and a Systems Engineering process – Principles and Case Study
Gilles Deleuze, Aurélie Léger, Pierre Yves Piriou, Sylvain Chabroux · 2014
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Modeling and Analysis of Safety-Critical Cyber Physical Systems using State/Event Fault Trees
Michael Roth, Peter Liggesmeyer · 2013
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Software Architecture and Dependability
Valérie Issarny, Apostolos Zarras · 2003
uncertain Transparent signal score 50/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
Stochastic Modeling for Software Reliability Assessment
James Ledoux · 2025
uncertain Transparent signal score 54/100 · policy 1.0.0
Found in hal · no DOI
Show all credibility signals
- not scoredDOI registered: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDOI resolves: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer