Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals.
- DOI
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609
- Published
- 2024 Dec 2
- Container
- JAMA network open
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609,
title = {Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals.},
author = {Li ZQ and Xu HL and Cao HJ and Liu ZL and Fei YT and Liu JP},
year = {2024},
journal = {JAMA network open},
doi = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals. AU - Li ZQ AU - Xu HL AU - Cao HJ AU - Liu ZL AU - Fei YT AU - Liu JP PY - 2024 JO - JAMA network open DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609 UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609 ER -
APA
ZQ, L., HL, X., HJ, C., ZL, L., YT, F., & JP, L. (2024). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals.. JAMA network open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48609
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T16:14:08.305Z