Comparison of three commercial multi‐energy CT and electron density phantoms for iodine quantification and tissue substitute characterization

Artur Omar, Robert Vorbau, Jens Zimmerman, Gavin Poludniowski

Open source

DOI
10.1002/acm2.70735
Published
2026-08
Container
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/acm2.70735,
  title = {Comparison of three commercial multi‐energy CT and electron density phantoms for iodine quantification and tissue substitute characterization},
  author = {Artur Omar and Robert Vorbau and Jens Zimmerman and Gavin Poludniowski},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics},
  doi = {10.1002/acm2.70735},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70735}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparison of three commercial multi‐energy CT and electron density phantoms for iodine quantification and tissue substitute characterization
AU  - Artur Omar
AU  - Robert Vorbau
AU  - Jens Zimmerman
AU  - Gavin Poludniowski
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
DO  - 10.1002/acm2.70735
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70735
ER  - 

APA

Omar, A., Vorbau, R., Zimmerman, J., & Poludniowski, G. (2026). Comparison of three commercial multi‐energy CT and electron density phantoms for iodine quantification and tissue substitute characterization. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70735

Source records