Response to letter to the editor, "Observational studies on glucocorticoid harm should always consider confounding by indication.".

Katz P, Michaud K

Open source

DOI
10.1002/acr2.70037
Published
2025 Jun
Container
ACR open rheumatology
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/acr2.70037,
  title = {Response to letter to the editor, "Observational studies on glucocorticoid harm should always consider confounding by indication.".},
  author = {Katz P and Michaud K},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {ACR open rheumatology},
  doi = {10.1002/acr2.70037},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70037}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Response to letter to the editor, "Observational studies on glucocorticoid harm should always consider confounding by indication.".
AU  - Katz P
AU  - Michaud K
PY  - 2025
JO  - ACR open rheumatology
DO  - 10.1002/acr2.70037
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70037
ER  - 

APA

P, K., & K, M. (2025). Response to letter to the editor, "Observational studies on glucocorticoid harm should always consider confounding by indication.".. ACR open rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.70037

Source records