Correction to “How Do Open‐Ended Interview and Closed‐Ended Questionnaire Responses Compare? A Matched Mixed‐Methods Study Examining Treatment Attitudes of Patients With Meniscal Tear and Persistent Pain”
- DOI
- 10.1002/acr2.90149
- Published
- 2026-09
- Container
- ACR Open Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 58/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/acr2.90149,
title = {Correction to “How Do Open‐Ended Interview and Closed‐Ended Questionnaire Responses Compare? A Matched Mixed‐Methods Study Examining Treatment Attitudes of Patients With Meniscal Tear and Persistent Pain”},
year = {2026},
journal = {ACR Open Rheumatology},
doi = {10.1002/acr2.90149},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.90149}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Correction to “How Do Open‐Ended Interview and Closed‐Ended Questionnaire Responses Compare? A Matched Mixed‐Methods Study Examining Treatment Attitudes of Patients With Meniscal Tear and Persistent Pain” PY - 2026 JO - ACR Open Rheumatology DO - 10.1002/acr2.90149 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.90149 ER -
APA
Correction to “How Do Open‐Ended Interview and Closed‐Ended Questionnaire Responses Compare? A Matched Mixed‐Methods Study Examining Treatment Attitudes of Patients With Meniscal Tear and Persistent Pain”. (2026). ACR Open Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.90149
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T05:09:30.328Z