Contrasting Historical and Physical Perspectives in Asymmetric Catalysis: ΔΔG<sup>≠</sup> versus Enantiomeric Excess.

Ruth M, Gensch T, Schreiner PR.

Open source

DOI
10.1002/anie.202410308
Published
2024-10-15
Container
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/anie.202410308,
  title = {Contrasting Historical and Physical Perspectives in Asymmetric Catalysis: ΔΔG<sup>≠</sup> versus Enantiomeric Excess.},
  author = {Ruth M and  Gensch T and  Schreiner PR.},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {Angew Chem Int Ed Engl},
  doi = {10.1002/anie.202410308},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202410308}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Contrasting Historical and Physical Perspectives in Asymmetric Catalysis: ΔΔG<sup>≠</sup> versus Enantiomeric Excess.
AU  - Ruth M
AU  -  Gensch T
AU  -  Schreiner PR.
PY  - 2024
JO  - Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
DO  - 10.1002/anie.202410308
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202410308
ER  - 

APA

M, R., T, G., & PR., S. (2024). Contrasting Historical and Physical Perspectives in Asymmetric Catalysis: ΔΔG<sup>≠</sup> versus Enantiomeric Excess.. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202410308

Source records