Evaluating the effectiveness of technology‐assisted learning versus traditional methods in histology education: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Eman Ali Elkordy

Open source

DOI
10.1002/ase.70221
Published
2026-03-25
Container
Anatomical Sciences Education
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/ase.70221,
  title = {Evaluating the effectiveness of technology‐assisted learning versus traditional methods in histology education: A systematic review and meta‐analysis},
  author = {Eman Ali Elkordy},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Anatomical Sciences Education},
  doi = {10.1002/ase.70221},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70221}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Evaluating the effectiveness of technology‐assisted learning versus traditional methods in histology education: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
AU  - Eman Ali Elkordy
PY  - 2026
JO  - Anatomical Sciences Education
DO  - 10.1002/ase.70221
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70221
ER  - 

APA

Elkordy, E. A. (2026). Evaluating the effectiveness of technology‐assisted learning versus traditional methods in histology education: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70221

Source records