Cost‐effectiveness of Resonance® metallic ureteral stent compared with standard polyurethane ureteral stents in malignant ureteric obstruction: A cost‐utility analysis

Dawn M. Cooper, Rachel Lines, Iqbal Shergill

Open source

DOI
10.1002/bco2.332
Published
2024-03-20
Container
BJUI Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/bco2.332,
  title = {Cost‐effectiveness of Resonance® metallic ureteral stent compared with standard polyurethane ureteral stents in malignant ureteric obstruction: A cost‐utility analysis},
  author = {Dawn M. Cooper and Rachel Lines and Iqbal Shergill},
  year = {2024},
  journal = {BJUI Compass},
  doi = {10.1002/bco2.332},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.332}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Cost‐effectiveness of Resonance® metallic ureteral stent compared with standard polyurethane ureteral stents in malignant ureteric obstruction: A cost‐utility analysis
AU  - Dawn M. Cooper
AU  - Rachel Lines
AU  - Iqbal Shergill
PY  - 2024
JO  - BJUI Compass
DO  - 10.1002/bco2.332
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.332
ER  - 

APA

Cooper, D. M., Lines, R., & Shergill, I. (2024). Cost‐effectiveness of Resonance® metallic ureteral stent compared with standard polyurethane ureteral stents in malignant ureteric obstruction: A cost‐utility analysis. BJUI Compass. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.332

Source records