Zuranolone: A case study in (regulatory) rush to judgement?

Cosgrove L, Kostic M, Mintzes B, D'Ambrozio G, Shaughnessy A

DOI: 10.1002/bcp.70472
Published: 2026 Feb 4
Container: British journal of clinical pharmacology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/bcp.70472,
  title = {Zuranolone: A case study in (regulatory) rush to judgement?},
  author = {Cosgrove L and Kostic M and Mintzes B and D'Ambrozio G and Shaughnessy A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {British journal of clinical pharmacology},
  doi = {10.1002/bcp.70472},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70472}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Zuranolone: A case study in (regulatory) rush to judgement?
AU  - Cosgrove L
AU  - Kostic M
AU  - Mintzes B
AU  - D'Ambrozio G
AU  - Shaughnessy A
PY  - 2026
JO  - British journal of clinical pharmacology
DO  - 10.1002/bcp.70472
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70472
ER  -

APA

L, C., M, K., B, M., G, D., & A, S. (2026). Zuranolone: A case study in (regulatory) rush to judgement?. British journal of clinical pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70472

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T10:24:22.937Z