Why Low‐Frequency EMF Safety Would Benefit From Peak‐Based Limits Instead of RMS Values

Florian Soyka, Carsten Alteköster

Open source

DOI
10.1002/bem.70051
Published
2026-03
Container
Bioelectromagnetics
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/bem.70051,
  title = {Why Low‐Frequency EMF Safety Would Benefit From Peak‐Based Limits Instead of RMS Values},
  author = {Florian Soyka and Carsten Alteköster},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Bioelectromagnetics},
  doi = {10.1002/bem.70051},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70051}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Why Low‐Frequency EMF Safety Would Benefit From Peak‐Based Limits Instead of RMS Values
AU  - Florian Soyka
AU  - Carsten Alteköster
PY  - 2026
JO  - Bioelectromagnetics
DO  - 10.1002/bem.70051
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70051
ER  - 

APA

Soyka, F., & Alteköster, C. (2026). Why Low‐Frequency EMF Safety Would Benefit From Peak‐Based Limits Instead of RMS Values. Bioelectromagnetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70051

Source records