Decalcified and Decellularized Bone Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Comparative In Vivo Study Using Rat Femur and Chicken Ulna Conduits
- DOI
- 10.1002/brb3.71546
- Published
- 2026-09
- Container
- Brain and Behavior
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/brb3.71546,
title = {Decalcified and Decellularized Bone Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Comparative In Vivo Study Using Rat Femur and Chicken Ulna Conduits},
author = {Zahra Sepehri and Ali Moradi and Nasser Mahdavi‐Shahri and Morteza Behnam Rassouli},
year = {2026},
journal = {Brain and Behavior},
doi = {10.1002/brb3.71546},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71546}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Decalcified and Decellularized Bone Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Comparative In Vivo Study Using Rat Femur and Chicken Ulna Conduits AU - Zahra Sepehri AU - Ali Moradi AU - Nasser Mahdavi‐Shahri AU - Morteza Behnam Rassouli PY - 2026 JO - Brain and Behavior DO - 10.1002/brb3.71546 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71546 ER -
APA
Sepehri, Z., Moradi, A., Mahdavi‐Shahri, N., & Rassouli, M. B. (2026). Decalcified and Decellularized Bone Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Comparative In Vivo Study Using Rat Femur and Chicken Ulna Conduits. Brain and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71546
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T08:50:55.701Z