The evidence base for ranger patrol effectiveness in conservation and how to improve it.
- DOI
- 10.1002/brv.70172
- Published
- 2026 Oct
- Container
- Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/brv.70172,
title = {The evidence base for ranger patrol effectiveness in conservation and how to improve it.},
author = {Rytwinski T and Pickles RSA and Muir MJ and Cooke SJ and Bennett JR and Kelly LA and Smith A and Cadet C and Adhiasto DN and Quiroz IA and Booton MD and Carlson DP and Cronin DT and Dancer A and Gore ML and Miller JRB and Pires SF and Pokempner A and Slade J and Lemieux AM},
year = {2026},
journal = {Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society},
doi = {10.1002/brv.70172},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/brv.70172}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - The evidence base for ranger patrol effectiveness in conservation and how to improve it. AU - Rytwinski T AU - Pickles RSA AU - Muir MJ AU - Cooke SJ AU - Bennett JR AU - Kelly LA AU - Smith A AU - Cadet C AU - Adhiasto DN AU - Quiroz IA AU - Booton MD AU - Carlson DP AU - Cronin DT AU - Dancer A AU - Gore ML AU - Miller JRB AU - Pires SF AU - Pokempner A AU - Slade J AU - Lemieux AM PY - 2026 JO - Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society DO - 10.1002/brv.70172 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/brv.70172 ER -
APA
T, R., RSA, P., MJ, M., SJ, C., JR, B., LA, K., A, S., C, C., DN, A., IA, Q., MD, B., DP, C., DT, C., A, D., ML, G., JRB, M., SF, P., A, P., J, S., & AM, L. (2026). The evidence base for ranger patrol effectiveness in conservation and how to improve it.. Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/brv.70172
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:28:05.861Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T13:28:05.874Z