Diagnostic Discordance in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Hysteroscopy Resolves Ultrasound– <scp>MRI</scp> Disagreement in Septate Uterus, but Concurrent Ovulation Induction Precludes Causal Attribution of the Reproductive Outcome

Iftekhar Ahmed Sakib, Ayesa Perveen, Nishad Tasnim

Open source

DOI
10.1002/ccr3.73515
Published
2026-09-23
Container
Clinical Case Reports
Publisher
Wiley
Open access
unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/ccr3.73515,
  title = {Diagnostic Discordance in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Hysteroscopy Resolves Ultrasound–
                    <scp>MRI</scp>
                    Disagreement in Septate Uterus, but Concurrent Ovulation Induction Precludes Causal Attribution of the Reproductive Outcome},
  author = {Iftekhar Ahmed Sakib and Ayesa Perveen and Nishad Tasnim},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Clinical Case Reports},
  doi = {10.1002/ccr3.73515},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.73515}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Diagnostic Discordance in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Hysteroscopy Resolves Ultrasound–
                    <scp>MRI</scp>
                    Disagreement in Septate Uterus, but Concurrent Ovulation Induction Precludes Causal Attribution of the Reproductive Outcome
AU  - Iftekhar Ahmed Sakib
AU  - Ayesa Perveen
AU  - Nishad Tasnim
PY  - 2026
JO  - Clinical Case Reports
DO  - 10.1002/ccr3.73515
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.73515
ER  - 

APA

Sakib, I. A., Perveen, A., & Tasnim, N. (2026). Diagnostic Discordance in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Hysteroscopy Resolves Ultrasound– <scp>MRI</scp> Disagreement in Septate Uterus, but Concurrent Ovulation Induction Precludes Causal Attribution of the Reproductive Outcome. Clinical Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.73515

Source records