Identifying important questions for Cochrane systematic reviews in Eyes and Vision: Report of a priority setting exercise.
- DOI
- 10.1002/cesm.12014
- Published
- 2023 May
- Container
- Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/cesm.12014,
title = {Identifying important questions for Cochrane systematic reviews in Eyes and Vision: Report of a priority setting exercise.},
author = {Evans JR and Gordon I and Azuara-Blanco A and Bowen M and Braithwaite T and Crosby-Nwaobi R and Gichuhi S and Hogg RE and Li T and Minogue V and Parker R and Rowe FJ and Shah A and Virgili G and Ramke J and Lawrenson JG and Cochrane Eyes and Vision Priority Setting Group Authorship},
year = {2023},
journal = {Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods},
doi = {10.1002/cesm.12014},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12014}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Identifying important questions for Cochrane systematic reviews in Eyes and Vision: Report of a priority setting exercise. AU - Evans JR AU - Gordon I AU - Azuara-Blanco A AU - Bowen M AU - Braithwaite T AU - Crosby-Nwaobi R AU - Gichuhi S AU - Hogg RE AU - Li T AU - Minogue V AU - Parker R AU - Rowe FJ AU - Shah A AU - Virgili G AU - Ramke J AU - Lawrenson JG AU - Cochrane Eyes and Vision Priority Setting Group Authorship PY - 2023 JO - Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods DO - 10.1002/cesm.12014 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12014 ER -
APA
JR, E., I, G., A, A., M, B., T, B., R, C., S, G., RE, H., T, L., V, M., R, P., FJ, R., A, S., G, V., J, R., JG, L., & Authorship, C. E. A. V. P. S. G. (2023). Identifying important questions for Cochrane systematic reviews in Eyes and Vision: Report of a priority setting exercise.. Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12014
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:38:18.141Z