Rating Down for Publication Bias is Rare in Cochrane Reviews: A Descriptive Study.
- DOI
- 10.1002/cesm.70089
- Published
- 2026-07-21
- Container
- Cochrane Evid Synth Methods
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/cesm.70089,
title = {Rating Down for Publication Bias is Rare in Cochrane Reviews: A Descriptive Study.},
author = {Toews M and Minozzi S and Stegeman BH and Cinquini M and Meerpohl JJ and Färnqvist K and Bruschettini M and Toews I.},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cochrane Evid Synth Methods},
doi = {10.1002/cesm.70089},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70089}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Rating Down for Publication Bias is Rare in Cochrane Reviews: A Descriptive Study. AU - Toews M AU - Minozzi S AU - Stegeman BH AU - Cinquini M AU - Meerpohl JJ AU - Färnqvist K AU - Bruschettini M AU - Toews I. PY - 2026 JO - Cochrane Evid Synth Methods DO - 10.1002/cesm.70089 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70089 ER -
APA
M, T., S, M., BH, S., M, C., JJ, M., K, F., M, B., & I., T. (2026). Rating Down for Publication Bias is Rare in Cochrane Reviews: A Descriptive Study.. Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.70089
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:38:02.219Z
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-27T02:38:02.218Z