Methodological Considerations Regarding the Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine in Hypertensive Emergencies.

Zhang S, Zhang Y

DOI: 10.1002/clc.70476
Published: 2026 Sep
Container: Clinical cardiology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/clc.70476,
  title = {Methodological Considerations Regarding the Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine in Hypertensive Emergencies.},
  author = {Zhang S and Zhang Y},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Clinical cardiology},
  doi = {10.1002/clc.70476},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70476}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Methodological Considerations Regarding the Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine in Hypertensive Emergencies.
AU  - Zhang S
AU  - Zhang Y
PY  - 2026
JO  - Clinical cardiology
DO  - 10.1002/clc.70476
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70476
ER  -

APA

S, Z., & Y, Z. (2026). Methodological Considerations Regarding the Comparison of Clevidipine and Nicardipine in Hypertensive Emergencies.. Clinical cardiology. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70476

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T23:15:52.695Z