Comparison of EBER flow FISH results from two facilities.
- DOI
- 10.1002/cyto.b.70091
- Published
- 2026 Nov 1
- Container
- Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/cyto.b.70091,
title = {Comparison of EBER flow FISH results from two facilities.},
author = {Nishimura M and Tomomasa D and Watanabe E and Tsuchiya K and Sato N and Takachi T and Imai K and Akiyama H and Ueki M and Yoshifuji K and Yasui H and Tanita K and Hoshino A and Kanegane H},
year = {2026},
journal = {Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry},
doi = {10.1002/cyto.b.70091},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.70091}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparison of EBER flow FISH results from two facilities. AU - Nishimura M AU - Tomomasa D AU - Watanabe E AU - Tsuchiya K AU - Sato N AU - Takachi T AU - Imai K AU - Akiyama H AU - Ueki M AU - Yoshifuji K AU - Yasui H AU - Tanita K AU - Hoshino A AU - Kanegane H PY - 2026 JO - Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry DO - 10.1002/cyto.b.70091 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.70091 ER -
APA
M, N., D, T., E, W., K, T., N, S., T, T., K, I., H, A., M, U., K, Y., H, Y., K, T., A, H., & H, K. (2026). Comparison of EBER flow FISH results from two facilities.. Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.70091
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T07:04:31.172Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-11-10T07:04:31.196Z