Environmental Impact of Conventional Versus Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Procedure-Based Life Cycle Assessment With Pooled Effectiveness Estimates.

Calabrese G, Moll F, Neves JAC, Bonacci L, Sinagra E, Castiglione F, Maida M, Albéniz-Arbizu E, Pioche M, Sferrazza S

Open source

DOI
10.1002/deo2.70457
Published
2027 Apr
Container
DEN open
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/deo2.70457,
  title = {Environmental Impact of Conventional Versus Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Procedure-Based Life Cycle Assessment With Pooled Effectiveness Estimates.},
  author = {Calabrese G and Moll F and Neves JAC and Bonacci L and Sinagra E and Castiglione F and Maida M and Albéniz-Arbizu E and Pioche M and Sferrazza S},
  year = {2027},
  journal = {DEN open},
  doi = {10.1002/deo2.70457},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70457}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Environmental Impact of Conventional Versus Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Procedure-Based Life Cycle Assessment With Pooled Effectiveness Estimates.
AU  - Calabrese G
AU  - Moll F
AU  - Neves JAC
AU  - Bonacci L
AU  - Sinagra E
AU  - Castiglione F
AU  - Maida M
AU  - Albéniz-Arbizu E
AU  - Pioche M
AU  - Sferrazza S
PY  - 2027
JO  - DEN open
DO  - 10.1002/deo2.70457
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70457
ER  - 

APA

G, C., F, M., JAC, N., L, B., E, S., F, C., M, M., E, A., M, P., & S, S. (2027). Environmental Impact of Conventional Versus Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Procedure-Based Life Cycle Assessment With Pooled Effectiveness Estimates.. DEN open. https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70457

Source records