What's in a Lie? How Researchers Judge the Justifiability of Deception.
- DOI
- 10.1002/eahr.60003
- Published
- 2025 May-Jun
- Container
- Ethics & human research
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/eahr.60003,
title = {What's in a Lie? How Researchers Judge the Justifiability of Deception.},
author = {Verbeke K and Krawczyk T and Baeyens D and Piasecki J and Borry P},
year = {2025},
journal = {Ethics \& human research},
doi = {10.1002/eahr.60003},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.60003}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - What's in a Lie? How Researchers Judge the Justifiability of Deception. AU - Verbeke K AU - Krawczyk T AU - Baeyens D AU - Piasecki J AU - Borry P PY - 2025 JO - Ethics & human research DO - 10.1002/eahr.60003 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.60003 ER -
APA
K, V., T, K., D, B., J, P., & P, B. (2025). What's in a Lie? How Researchers Judge the Justifiability of Deception.. Ethics & human research. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.60003
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T18:42:25.416Z