Method matters: Comparing habitat- and process-based approaches for favorability assessment.
- DOI
- 10.1002/eap.70060
- Published
- 2025 Jun
- Container
- Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/eap.70060,
title = {Method matters: Comparing habitat- and process-based approaches for favorability assessment.},
author = {Holt G and Dwyer GK and Lester RE},
year = {2025},
journal = {Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America},
doi = {10.1002/eap.70060},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70060}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Method matters: Comparing habitat- and process-based approaches for favorability assessment. AU - Holt G AU - Dwyer GK AU - Lester RE PY - 2025 JO - Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America DO - 10.1002/eap.70060 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70060 ER -
APA
G, H., GK, D., & RE, L. (2025). Method matters: Comparing habitat- and process-based approaches for favorability assessment.. Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70060
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:38:10.467Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T02:38:10.473Z