Separating Sampling Bias From Abundance Shows That Different Methods Catch Different Wild Bees.

McCarthy MW, Simpson DT, Aldercotte AH, Smith C, Harrison T, Winfree R

DOI: 10.1002/ece3.73060
Published: 2026 Feb
Container: Ecology and evolution
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/ece3.73060,
  title = {Separating Sampling Bias From Abundance Shows That Different Methods Catch Different Wild Bees.},
  author = {McCarthy MW and Simpson DT and Aldercotte AH and Smith C and Harrison T and Winfree R},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Ecology and evolution},
  doi = {10.1002/ece3.73060},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73060}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Separating Sampling Bias From Abundance Shows That Different Methods Catch Different Wild Bees.
AU  - McCarthy MW
AU  - Simpson DT
AU  - Aldercotte AH
AU  - Smith C
AU  - Harrison T
AU  - Winfree R
PY  - 2026
JO  - Ecology and evolution
DO  - 10.1002/ece3.73060
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73060
ER  -

APA

MW, M., DT, S., AH, A., C, S., T, H., & R, W. (2026). Separating Sampling Bias From Abundance Shows That Different Methods Catch Different Wild Bees.. Ecology and evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.73060

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T10:09:50.676Z