Congruence between future distribution models and empirical data for an iconic species at Joshua Tree National Park
- DOI
- 10.1002/ecs2.2763
- Published
- 06
- Container
- Ecosphere
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- supportingDirectory of Open Access Journals: A matching record was returned by DOAJ.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/ecs2.2763,
title = {Congruence between future distribution models and empirical data for an iconic species at Joshua Tree National Park},
author = {Lynn C. Sweet and Tyler Green and James G. C. Heintz and Neil Frakes and Nicolas Graver and Jeff S. Rangitsch and Jane E. Rodgers and Scott Heacox and Cameron W. Barrows},
year = {2019},
journal = {Ecosphere},
doi = {10.1002/ecs2.2763},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2763}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Congruence between future distribution models and empirical data for an iconic species at Joshua Tree National Park AU - Lynn C. Sweet AU - Tyler Green AU - James G. C. Heintz AU - Neil Frakes AU - Nicolas Graver AU - Jeff S. Rangitsch AU - Jane E. Rodgers AU - Scott Heacox AU - Cameron W. Barrows PY - 2019 JO - Ecosphere DO - 10.1002/ecs2.2763 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2763 ER -
APA
Sweet, L. C., Green, T., Heintz, J. G. C., Frakes, N., Graver, N., Rangitsch, J. S., Rodgers, J. E., Heacox, S., & Barrows, C. W. (2019). Congruence between future distribution models and empirical data for an iconic species at Joshua Tree National Park. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2763
Source records
- doaj · retrieved 2026-09-26T00:04:32.453Z