Ecological meta-analyses often produce unwarranted results.

Peacor SD, Song C, Bence JR, Briggs AA, Hamman EA, Osenberg CW.

DOI: 10.1002/ecy.70269
Published: 2025-12-01
Container: Ecology
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/ecy.70269,
  title = {Ecological meta-analyses often produce unwarranted results.},
  author = {Peacor SD and  Song C and  Bence JR and  Briggs AA and  Hamman EA and  Osenberg CW.},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Ecology},
  doi = {10.1002/ecy.70269},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70269}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ecological meta-analyses often produce unwarranted results.
AU  - Peacor SD
AU  -  Song C
AU  -  Bence JR
AU  -  Briggs AA
AU  -  Hamman EA
AU  -  Osenberg CW.
PY  - 2025
JO  - Ecology
DO  - 10.1002/ecy.70269
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70269
ER  -

APA

SD, P., C, S., JR, B., AA, B., EA, H., & CW., O. (2025). Ecological meta-analyses often produce unwarranted results.. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.70269

Source records

europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-11-10T13:30:39.447Z