Minimally Invasive Remote Approaches Versus Conventional Open Approach in Central Neck Dissection for Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1002/hed.70395
- Published
- 2026 Oct
- Container
- Head & neck
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/hed.70395,
title = {Minimally Invasive Remote Approaches Versus Conventional Open Approach in Central Neck Dissection for Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
author = {Valenziano C and Costantino A and Sebastiani M and Russell MD and Abdelhamid Ahmed AH and Randolph GW and Spriano G and Ferreli F and Mercante G and Canali L},
year = {2026},
journal = {Head \& neck},
doi = {10.1002/hed.70395},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70395}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Minimally Invasive Remote Approaches Versus Conventional Open Approach in Central Neck Dissection for Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AU - Valenziano C AU - Costantino A AU - Sebastiani M AU - Russell MD AU - Abdelhamid Ahmed AH AU - Randolph GW AU - Spriano G AU - Ferreli F AU - Mercante G AU - Canali L PY - 2026 JO - Head & neck DO - 10.1002/hed.70395 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70395 ER -
APA
C, V., A, C., M, S., MD, R., AH, A. A., GW, R., G, S., F, F., G, M., & L, C. (2026). Minimally Invasive Remote Approaches Versus Conventional Open Approach in Central Neck Dissection for Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Head & neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70395
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T03:40:49.303Z