When only zero risk is acceptable-Why science is not enough.

Swanson S, Gilron G, Dias J

DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1876
Published: 2017 Mar
Container: Integrated environmental assessment and management
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/ieam.1876,
  title = {When only zero risk is acceptable-Why science is not enough.},
  author = {Swanson S and Gilron G and Dias J},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Integrated environmental assessment and management},
  doi = {10.1002/ieam.1876},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1876}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - When only zero risk is acceptable-Why science is not enough.
AU  - Swanson S
AU  - Gilron G
AU  - Dias J
PY  - 2017
JO  - Integrated environmental assessment and management
DO  - 10.1002/ieam.1876
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1876
ER  -

APA

S, S., G, G., & J, D. (2017). When only zero risk is acceptable-Why science is not enough.. Integrated environmental assessment and management. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1876

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:14:58.160Z
europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-26T03:14:58.148Z