Choice with ethical outcomes: Sign effect, commodity effect, and ethical theory preference

David J. Cox, Claudia Diaz‐Salvat, Laura Weil, Asim Javed

Open source

DOI: 10.1002/jeab.70109
Published: 2026-05
Container: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Publisher: Wiley
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/jeab.70109,
  title = {Choice with ethical outcomes: Sign effect, commodity effect, and ethical theory preference},
  author = {David J. Cox and Claudia Diaz‐Salvat and Laura Weil and Asim Javed},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior},
  doi = {10.1002/jeab.70109},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70109}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Choice with ethical outcomes: Sign effect, commodity effect, and ethical theory preference
AU  - David J. Cox
AU  - Claudia Diaz‐Salvat
AU  - Laura Weil
AU  - Asim Javed
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
DO  - 10.1002/jeab.70109
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70109
ER  -

APA

Cox, D. J., Diaz‐Salvat, C., Weil, L., & Javed, A. (2026). Choice with ethical outcomes: Sign effect, commodity effect, and ethical theory preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.70109

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-11-04T23:13:49.425Z