Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis.
- DOI
- 10.1002/jmri.24625
- Published
- 2014-04-03
- Container
- J Magn Reson Imaging
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/jmri.24625,
title = {Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis.},
author = {Singh A and Steadman CD and Khan JN and Horsfield MA and Bekele S and Nazir SA and Kanagala P and Masca NG and Clarysse P and McCann GP.},
year = {2015},
journal = {J Magn Reson Imaging},
doi = {10.1002/jmri.24625},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24625}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis. AU - Singh A AU - Steadman CD AU - Khan JN AU - Horsfield MA AU - Bekele S AU - Nazir SA AU - Kanagala P AU - Masca NG AU - Clarysse P AU - McCann GP. PY - 2015 JO - J Magn Reson Imaging DO - 10.1002/jmri.24625 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24625 ER -
APA
A, S., CD, S., JN, K., MA, H., S, B., SA, N., P, K., NG, M., P, C., & GP., M. (2015). Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis.. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24625
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-27T07:25:09.658Z
- hal · retrieved 2026-09-27T07:25:09.691Z