Imaging-Guided Versus Conventional Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ahmed S, Sawalha K, Sharief M, Ammar A

Open source

DOI
10.1002/joa3.70449
Published
2026 Aug
Container
Journal of arrhythmia
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 53/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/joa3.70449,
  title = {Imaging-Guided Versus Conventional Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
  author = {Ahmed S and Sawalha K and Sharief M and Ammar A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of arrhythmia},
  doi = {10.1002/joa3.70449},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70449}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Imaging-Guided Versus Conventional Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
AU  - Ahmed S
AU  - Sawalha K
AU  - Sharief M
AU  - Ammar A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of arrhythmia
DO  - 10.1002/joa3.70449
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70449
ER  - 

APA

S, A., K, S., M, S., & A, A. (2026). Imaging-Guided Versus Conventional Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Journal of arrhythmia. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.70449

Source records