3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.

Mania S, Maniglio M, Wirth MA, Nagy L, Reissner L, Schweizer A

Open source

DOI
10.1002/jor.70220
Published
2026 May
Container
Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/jor.70220,
  title = {3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.},
  author = {Mania S and Maniglio M and Wirth MA and Nagy L and Reissner L and Schweizer A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society},
  doi = {10.1002/jor.70220},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70220}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.
AU  - Mania S
AU  - Maniglio M
AU  - Wirth MA
AU  - Nagy L
AU  - Reissner L
AU  - Schweizer A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
DO  - 10.1002/jor.70220
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70220
ER  - 

APA

S, M., M, M., MA, W., L, N., L, R., & A, S. (2026). 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70220

Source records