3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.
- DOI
- 10.1002/jor.70220
- Published
- 2026 May
- Container
- Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/jor.70220,
title = {3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.},
author = {Mania S and Maniglio M and Wirth MA and Nagy L and Reissner L and Schweizer A},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society},
doi = {10.1002/jor.70220},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70220}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases. AU - Mania S AU - Maniglio M AU - Wirth MA AU - Nagy L AU - Reissner L AU - Schweizer A PY - 2026 JO - Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society DO - 10.1002/jor.70220 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70220 ER -
APA
S, M., M, M., MA, W., L, N., L, R., & A, S. (2026). 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Guides Versus Conventional Techniques for Scaphoid Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 89 Cases.. Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.70220
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:34:10.681Z