No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.

van der Linden C, Trapp P, Dembek TA, Schedlich-Teufer C, Brandt GA, Jergas H, Fink GR, Visser-Vandewalle V, Barbe MT, Petry-Schmelzer JN

Open source

DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.70886
Published: 2026 Nov 2
Container: Movement disorders clinical practice
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/mdc3.70886,
  title = {No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.},
  author = {van der Linden C and Trapp P and Dembek TA and Schedlich-Teufer C and Brandt GA and Jergas H and Fink GR and Visser-Vandewalle V and Barbe MT and Petry-Schmelzer JN},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Movement disorders clinical practice},
  doi = {10.1002/mdc3.70886},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.
AU  - van der Linden C
AU  - Trapp P
AU  - Dembek TA
AU  - Schedlich-Teufer C
AU  - Brandt GA
AU  - Jergas H
AU  - Fink GR
AU  - Visser-Vandewalle V
AU  - Barbe MT
AU  - Petry-Schmelzer JN
PY  - 2026
JO  - Movement disorders clinical practice
DO  - 10.1002/mdc3.70886
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886
ER  -

APA

C, V. D. L., P, T., TA, D., C, S., GA, B., H, J., GR, F., V, V., MT, B., & JN, P. (2026). No Additional Benefit of 185 Hz Versus 130 Hz at Equivalent Energy in Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial.. Movement disorders clinical practice. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70886

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-10T07:20:47.806Z