Defining ground truth for prostate segmentation of transrectal ultrasound images: Inter‐ and intra‐observer variability of manual versus semi‐automatic methods
- DOI
- 10.1002/mp.18025
- Published
- 2025-08
- Container
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/mp.18025,
title = {Defining ground truth for prostate segmentation of transrectal ultrasound images: Inter‐ and intra‐observer variability of manual versus semi‐automatic methods},
author = {Louis Lenfant and Clément Beitone and Jocelyne Troccaz and Gaelle Fiard and Bernard Malavaud and Sandrine Voros and Pierre C. Mozer},
year = {2025},
journal = {Medical Physics},
doi = {10.1002/mp.18025},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.18025}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Defining ground truth for prostate segmentation of transrectal ultrasound images: Inter‐ and intra‐observer variability of manual versus semi‐automatic methods AU - Louis Lenfant AU - Clément Beitone AU - Jocelyne Troccaz AU - Gaelle Fiard AU - Bernard Malavaud AU - Sandrine Voros AU - Pierre C. Mozer PY - 2025 JO - Medical Physics DO - 10.1002/mp.18025 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.18025 ER -
APA
Lenfant, L., Beitone, C., Troccaz, J., Fiard, G., Malavaud, B., Voros, S., & Mozer, P. C. (2025). Defining ground truth for prostate segmentation of transrectal ultrasound images: Inter‐ and intra‐observer variability of manual versus semi‐automatic methods. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.18025
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T19:04:31.632Z