Comparative study of mobile acoustic uroflowmetry and conventional uroflowmetry: A systematic review and meta analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1002/nau.25405
- Published
- 2024-02-19
- Container
- Neurourol Urodyn
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/nau.25405,
title = {Comparative study of mobile acoustic uroflowmetry and conventional uroflowmetry: A systematic review and meta analysis.},
author = {Rangganata E and Rahardjo HE and Rasyid N and Widia F and Murwantara IM and Yugopuspito P and Gemilang B and Nasher FZ and Syadza YZ and Yonathan K and Birowo P.},
year = {2024},
journal = {Neurourol Urodyn},
doi = {10.1002/nau.25405},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25405}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparative study of mobile acoustic uroflowmetry and conventional uroflowmetry: A systematic review and meta analysis. AU - Rangganata E AU - Rahardjo HE AU - Rasyid N AU - Widia F AU - Murwantara IM AU - Yugopuspito P AU - Gemilang B AU - Nasher FZ AU - Syadza YZ AU - Yonathan K AU - Birowo P. PY - 2024 JO - Neurourol Urodyn DO - 10.1002/nau.25405 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25405 ER -
APA
E, R., HE, R., N, R., F, W., IM, M., P, Y., B, G., FZ, N., YZ, S., K, Y., & P., B. (2024). Comparative study of mobile acoustic uroflowmetry and conventional uroflowmetry: A systematic review and meta analysis.. Neurourol Urodyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25405
Source records
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:34:57.103Z