Sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Oxybutynin in Children With Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Arunaa S, Babu R, Madhu R, Kumaravel S.

Open source

DOI
10.1002/nau.70451
Published
2026-09-21
Container
Neurourol Urodyn
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
no

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/nau.70451,
  title = {Sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Oxybutynin in Children With Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.},
  author = {Arunaa S and  Babu R and  Madhu R and  Kumaravel S.},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Neurourol Urodyn},
  doi = {10.1002/nau.70451},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70451}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Oxybutynin in Children With Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
AU  - Arunaa S
AU  -  Babu R
AU  -  Madhu R
AU  -  Kumaravel S.
PY  - 2026
JO  - Neurourol Urodyn
DO  - 10.1002/nau.70451
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70451
ER  - 

APA

S, A., R, B., R, M., & S., K. (2026). Sacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Oxybutynin in Children With Overactive Bladder: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.. Neurourol Urodyn. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.70451

Source records