Optimal Control-Based RF Pulses Versus Classical Motion-Encoding Strategies for In Vivo Hepatic MR Elastography Across Multiple Excitation Frequencies in Mice: Reproducibility Assessment.

Bakir-Ageron T, Sango-Solanas P, Van Reeth E, Grenier D, Koon KTV, Beuf O

Open source

DOI
10.1002/nbm.70395
Published
2026 Oct
Container
NMR in biomedicine
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/nbm.70395,
  title = {Optimal Control-Based RF Pulses Versus Classical Motion-Encoding Strategies for In Vivo Hepatic MR Elastography Across Multiple Excitation Frequencies in Mice: Reproducibility Assessment.},
  author = {Bakir-Ageron T and Sango-Solanas P and Van Reeth E and Grenier D and Koon KTV and Beuf O},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {NMR in biomedicine},
  doi = {10.1002/nbm.70395},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70395}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Optimal Control-Based RF Pulses Versus Classical Motion-Encoding Strategies for In Vivo Hepatic MR Elastography Across Multiple Excitation Frequencies in Mice: Reproducibility Assessment.
AU  - Bakir-Ageron T
AU  - Sango-Solanas P
AU  - Van Reeth E
AU  - Grenier D
AU  - Koon KTV
AU  - Beuf O
PY  - 2026
JO  - NMR in biomedicine
DO  - 10.1002/nbm.70395
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70395
ER  - 

APA

T, B., P, S., E, V. R., D, G., KTV, K., & O, B. (2026). Optimal Control-Based RF Pulses Versus Classical Motion-Encoding Strategies for In Vivo Hepatic MR Elastography Across Multiple Excitation Frequencies in Mice: Reproducibility Assessment.. NMR in biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70395

Source records