Comparison of the ability of double‐robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. <scp>A M</scp> onte <scp>C</scp> arlo simulation study
- DOI
- 10.1002/pds.4325
- Published
- 2017-10-06
- Container
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/pds.4325,
title = {Comparison of the ability of double‐robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis.
<scp>A M</scp>
onte
<scp>C</scp>
arlo simulation study},
author = {Tri‐Long Nguyen and Gary S. Collins and Jessica Spence and Philip J. Devereaux and Jean‐Pierre Daurès and Paul Landais and Yannick Le Manach},
year = {2017},
journal = {Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety},
doi = {10.1002/pds.4325},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4325}
}RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of the ability of double‐robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis.
<scp>A M</scp>
onte
<scp>C</scp>
arlo simulation study
AU - Tri‐Long Nguyen
AU - Gary S. Collins
AU - Jessica Spence
AU - Philip J. Devereaux
AU - Jean‐Pierre Daurès
AU - Paul Landais
AU - Yannick Le Manach
PY - 2017
JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
DO - 10.1002/pds.4325
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4325
ER - APA
Nguyen, T., Collins, G. S., Spence, J., Devereaux, P. J., Daurès, J., Landais, P., & Manach, Y. L. (2017). Comparison of the ability of double‐robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. <scp>A M</scp> onte <scp>C</scp> arlo simulation study. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4325
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T15:08:57.830Z