Comparative performance of the traditional and reverse diagnostic algorithms for syphilis in pregnancy.

Dionne JA, Tamhane A, Golden T, Shrestha KS, Jones AV, Van Der Pol B, Hook EW 3rd, Subramaniam A

Open source

DOI
10.1002/pmf2.70228
Published
2026 Jan
Container
Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)
Publisher
Not recorded
Open access
yes

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/pmf2.70228,
  title = {Comparative performance of the traditional and reverse diagnostic algorithms for syphilis in pregnancy.},
  author = {Dionne JA and Tamhane A and Golden T and Shrestha KS and Jones AV and Van Der Pol B and Hook EW 3rd and Subramaniam A},
  year = {2026},
  journal = {Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)},
  doi = {10.1002/pmf2.70228},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70228}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Comparative performance of the traditional and reverse diagnostic algorithms for syphilis in pregnancy.
AU  - Dionne JA
AU  - Tamhane A
AU  - Golden T
AU  - Shrestha KS
AU  - Jones AV
AU  - Van Der Pol B
AU  - Hook EW 3rd
AU  - Subramaniam A
PY  - 2026
JO  - Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.)
DO  - 10.1002/pmf2.70228
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70228
ER  - 

APA

JA, D., A, T., T, G., KS, S., AV, J., B, V. D. P., 3rd, H. E., & A, S. (2026). Comparative performance of the traditional and reverse diagnostic algorithms for syphilis in pregnancy.. Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70228

Source records