Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group.
- DOI
- 10.1002/pst.1745
- Published
- 2017 Jan
- Container
- Pharmaceutical statistics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/pst.1745,
title = {Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group.},
author = {Phillips A and Abellan-Andres J and Soren A and Bretz F and Fletcher C and France L and Garrett A and Harris R and Kjaer M and Keene O and Morgan D and O'Kelly M and Roger J},
year = {2017},
journal = {Pharmaceutical statistics},
doi = {10.1002/pst.1745},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1745}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group. AU - Phillips A AU - Abellan-Andres J AU - Soren A AU - Bretz F AU - Fletcher C AU - France L AU - Garrett A AU - Harris R AU - Kjaer M AU - Keene O AU - Morgan D AU - O'Kelly M AU - Roger J PY - 2017 JO - Pharmaceutical statistics DO - 10.1002/pst.1745 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1745 ER -
APA
A, P., J, A., A, S., F, B., C, F., L, F., A, G., R, H., M, K., O, K., D, M., M, O., & J, R. (2017). Estimands: discussion points from the PSI estimands and sensitivity expert group.. Pharmaceutical statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1745
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T07:28:40.943Z