Comment on Jaki et al., A proposal for a new PhD level curriculum on quantitative methods for drug development. Pharmaceutical Statistics 17 (5):593-606, Sep/Oct 2018, DOI: 10.1002/pst.1873.
- DOI
- 10.1002/pst.1940
- Published
- 2019 May
- Container
- Pharmaceutical statistics
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/pst.1940,
title = {Comment on Jaki et al., A proposal for a new PhD level curriculum on quantitative methods for drug development. Pharmaceutical Statistics 17 (5):593-606, Sep/Oct 2018, DOI: 10.1002/pst.1873.},
author = {Krause A and Kloft C and Huisinga W and Karlsson M and Pinheiro J and Bies R and Rogers J and Mentré F and Musser BJ and ASA Special Interest Group on Statistics and Pharmacometrics/ASA Special Interest Group on Statistics and Pharmacometrics (SIG SxP)},
year = {2019},
journal = {Pharmaceutical statistics},
doi = {10.1002/pst.1940},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1940}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comment on Jaki et al., A proposal for a new PhD level curriculum on quantitative methods for drug development. Pharmaceutical Statistics 17 (5):593-606, Sep/Oct 2018, DOI: 10.1002/pst.1873. AU - Krause A AU - Kloft C AU - Huisinga W AU - Karlsson M AU - Pinheiro J AU - Bies R AU - Rogers J AU - Mentré F AU - Musser BJ AU - ASA Special Interest Group on Statistics and Pharmacometrics/ASA Special Interest Group on Statistics and Pharmacometrics (SIG SxP) PY - 2019 JO - Pharmaceutical statistics DO - 10.1002/pst.1940 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1940 ER -
APA
A, K., C, K., W, H., M, K., J, P., R, B., J, R., F, M., BJ, M., & SxP), A. S. I. G. O. S. A. P. S. I. G. O. S. A. P. (. (2019). Comment on Jaki et al., A proposal for a new PhD level curriculum on quantitative methods for drug development. Pharmaceutical Statistics 17 (5):593-606, Sep/Oct 2018, DOI: 10.1002/pst.1873.. Pharmaceutical statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.1940
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T01:40:09.842Z