Case study of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge—Energy usage, footprint, and nutrient removal
- DOI
- 10.1002/wer.10914
- Published
- 2023-08
- Container
- Water Environment Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1002/wer.10914,
title = {Case study of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge—Energy usage, footprint, and nutrient removal},
author = {Jennifer Ekholm and Mark de Blois and Frank Persson and David J. I. Gustavsson and Simon Bengtsson and Tim van Erp and Britt‐Marie Wilén},
year = {2023},
journal = {Water Environment Research},
doi = {10.1002/wer.10914},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10914}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Case study of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge—Energy usage, footprint, and nutrient removal AU - Jennifer Ekholm AU - Mark de Blois AU - Frank Persson AU - David J. I. Gustavsson AU - Simon Bengtsson AU - Tim van Erp AU - Britt‐Marie Wilén PY - 2023 JO - Water Environment Research DO - 10.1002/wer.10914 UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10914 ER -
APA
Ekholm, J., Blois, M. D., Persson, F., Gustavsson, D. J. I., Bengtsson, S., Erp, T. V., & Wilén, B. (2023). Case study of aerobic granular sludge and activated sludge—Energy usage, footprint, and nutrient removal. Water Environment Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10914
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T05:38:09.529Z