An investigation of the impact of Melbourne Zoo's “Seal‐the‐Loop” donate call‐to‐action on visitor satisfaction and behavior

Sarah Mellish, Ben Sanders, Carla A. Litchfield, Elissa L. Pearson

Open source

DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21365
Published: 2017-05
Container: Zoo Biology
Publisher: Wiley
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1002/zoo.21365,
  title = {An investigation of the impact of Melbourne Zoo's “Seal‐the‐Loop” donate call‐to‐action on visitor satisfaction and behavior},
  author = {Sarah Mellish and Ben Sanders and Carla A. Litchfield and Elissa L. Pearson},
  year = {2017},
  journal = {Zoo Biology},
  doi = {10.1002/zoo.21365},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21365}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - An investigation of the impact of Melbourne Zoo's “Seal‐the‐Loop” donate call‐to‐action on visitor satisfaction and behavior
AU  - Sarah Mellish
AU  - Ben Sanders
AU  - Carla A. Litchfield
AU  - Elissa L. Pearson
PY  - 2017
JO  - Zoo Biology
DO  - 10.1002/zoo.21365
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21365
ER  -

APA

Mellish, S., Sanders, B., Litchfield, C. A., & Pearson, E. L. (2017). An investigation of the impact of Melbourne Zoo's “Seal‐the‐Loop” donate call‐to‐action on visitor satisfaction and behavior. Zoo Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21365

Source records

crossref · retrieved 2026-09-25T17:45:13.938Z