Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models
- DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18
- Published
- 2010
- Container
- IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
uncertain Score 64/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- supportingDOI registered: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- supportingDOI resolves: A matching record was returned by Crossref.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- supportingMetadata completeness: All 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18,
title = {Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models},
author = {Etiel Petrinja and Alberto Sillitti and Giancarlo Succi},
year = {2010},
journal = {IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models AU - Etiel Petrinja AU - Alberto Sillitti AU - Giancarlo Succi PY - 2010 JO - IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology DO - 10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18 ER -
APA
Petrinja, E., Sillitti, A., & Succi, G. (2010). Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM Assessment Models. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13244-5_18
Source records
- crossref · retrieved 2026-09-26T04:17:39.509Z