In-Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Aspiration and Superbore Aspiration Catheters to Conventional 6Fr Aspiration for LVO Stroke.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9
- Published
- 2026 Sep 16
- Container
- Clinical neuroradiology
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- unknown
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9,
title = {In-Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Aspiration and Superbore Aspiration Catheters to Conventional 6Fr Aspiration for LVO Stroke.},
author = {Hassan AE and Murillo Artigues M and Adedeji AR and Mullins L and Thornton J and Fitzgerald S},
year = {2026},
journal = {Clinical neuroradiology},
doi = {10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - In-Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Aspiration and Superbore Aspiration Catheters to Conventional 6Fr Aspiration for LVO Stroke. AU - Hassan AE AU - Murillo Artigues M AU - Adedeji AR AU - Mullins L AU - Thornton J AU - Fitzgerald S PY - 2026 JO - Clinical neuroradiology DO - 10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9 ER -
APA
AE, H., M, M. A., AR, A., L, M., J, T., & S, F. (2026). In-Vitro Comparison of Cyclic Aspiration and Superbore Aspiration Catheters to Conventional 6Fr Aspiration for LVO Stroke.. Clinical neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01722-9
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T08:38:23.933Z