[What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].

Rittner HL, Kranke P, Schäfer M, Roewer N, Brack A

DOI: 10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6
Published: 2009 Dec
Container: Der Anaesthesist
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6,
  title = {[What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].},
  author = {Rittner HL and Kranke P and Schäfer M and Roewer N and Brack A},
  year = {2009},
  journal = {Der Anaesthesist},
  doi = {10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].
AU  - Rittner HL
AU  - Kranke P
AU  - Schäfer M
AU  - Roewer N
AU  - Brack A
PY  - 2009
JO  - Der Anaesthesist
DO  - 10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6
ER  -

APA

HL, R., P, K., M, S., N, R., & A, B. (2009). [What can we learn from the Scott Reuben case? Scientific misconduct in anaesthesiology].. Der Anaesthesist. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-009-1637-6

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-27T12:02:54.790Z