[Expert medical opinions from the point of view of the legal profession].

Ulsenheimer K, Schlund GH, Ratzel R

DOI: 10.1007/s001010050631
Published: 1998 Oct
Container: Der Anaesthesist
Publisher: Not recorded
Open access: unknown

Credibility signals

limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.

Show all credibility signals

cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response. Source: Crossref; license: CC0 metadata
not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility. Source: DOAJ; license: CC0
not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete. Source: Retraction Watch; license: CC BY 4.0
not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made. Source: No authority result supplied; license: Unknown
not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer
cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty. Source: Normalized work metadata; license: Caller-provided; provenance license not supplied to scorer

Cite this work

BibTeX

@article{allodium:10.1007/s001010050631,
  title = {[Expert medical opinions from the point of view of the legal profession].},
  author = {Ulsenheimer K and Schlund GH and Ratzel R},
  year = {1998},
  journal = {Der Anaesthesist},
  doi = {10.1007/s001010050631},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050631}
}

RIS

TY  - JOUR
TI  - [Expert medical opinions from the point of view of the legal profession].
AU  - Ulsenheimer K
AU  - Schlund GH
AU  - Ratzel R
PY  - 1998
JO  - Der Anaesthesist
DO  - 10.1007/s001010050631
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050631
ER  -

APA

K, U., GH, S., & R, R. (1998). [Expert medical opinions from the point of view of the legal profession].. Der Anaesthesist. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050631

Source records

pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T15:27:31.003Z