[Vitamin D supplementation in depression-Meaningful, evidence-based or guideline-compliant?].
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2
- Published
- 2026 Sep
- Container
- Der Nervenarzt
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- yes
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 45/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- supportingOpen access status: Normalized open-access status: open.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2,
title = {[Vitamin D supplementation in depression-Meaningful, evidence-based or guideline-compliant?].},
author = {Röh A and Hiltensperger R and Schepp M and Halms T and Hasan A and Mueller-Stierlin AS},
year = {2026},
journal = {Der Nervenarzt},
doi = {10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - [Vitamin D supplementation in depression-Meaningful, evidence-based or guideline-compliant?]. AU - Röh A AU - Hiltensperger R AU - Schepp M AU - Halms T AU - Hasan A AU - Mueller-Stierlin AS PY - 2026 JO - Der Nervenarzt DO - 10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2 ER -
APA
A, R., R, H., M, S., T, H., A, H., & AS, M. (2026). [Vitamin D supplementation in depression-Meaningful, evidence-based or guideline-compliant?].. Der Nervenarzt. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-02000-2
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-11-11T01:22:43.532Z