Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6
- Published
- 2026 Sep 3
- Container
- International urogynecology journal
- Publisher
- Not recorded
- Open access
- no
Credibility signals
limited evidence Score 43/100 under policy 1.0.0. This is a metadata assessment, not a judgment of the paper's conclusions.
Show all credibility signals
- cautionDOI registered: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- cautionDOI resolves: No matching Crossref record was present in this response.
- not scoredDirectory of Open Access Journals: No matching DOAJ record was present in this response. No allow-list match; this is not evidence of low credibility.
- not scoredMEDLINE indexed: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredOpenAlex core source: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredKnown publisher allow-list: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredROR affiliation: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredRetraction Watch retraction: No retraction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch expression of concern: No expression of concern notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch correction: No correction notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredRetraction Watch reinstatement: No reinstatement notice matched this DOI in the deployed snapshot. No matching event found; coverage may be incomplete.
- not scoredOpen access status: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication license: Not checked or no result supplied; no credibility inference made.
- not scoredPublication version: A publication version was supplied but is not scored.
- cautionMetadata completeness: 5 of 6 scored descriptive metadata groups are present; missing fields increase uncertainty.
Cite this work
BibTeX
@article{allodium:10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6,
title = {Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.},
author = {Huffman JA and Ashmore S and Kim S and Samdariya D and Reddy P and Wood M and Kang K and Zillioux J and Grimes CL and Gupta A and Sisson A and Matthews CA},
year = {2026},
journal = {International urogynecology journal},
doi = {10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6}
}RIS
TY - JOUR TI - Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AU - Huffman JA AU - Ashmore S AU - Kim S AU - Samdariya D AU - Reddy P AU - Wood M AU - Kang K AU - Zillioux J AU - Grimes CL AU - Gupta A AU - Sisson A AU - Matthews CA PY - 2026 JO - International urogynecology journal DO - 10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6 UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6 ER -
APA
JA, H., S, A., S, K., D, S., P, R., M, W., K, K., J, Z., CL, G., A, G., A, S., & CA, M. (2026). Hysterectomy with Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Native Tissue Repair for Primary Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. International urogynecology journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-026-06863-6
Source records
- pubmed · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:52:09.352Z
- europe-pmc · retrieved 2026-09-25T05:52:09.373Z